MedPath

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
Interventions
Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Registration Number
NCT04063995
Lead Sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Brief Summary

The reticulospinal pathway (RSP) is at the center of spasticity mechanism. The RSP indirectly synapses with motor neurons via interneurons in the ventromedial intermediate zone in both halves of the spinal cord, and directly synapses with motor neurons of proximal extremity muscles. The main motor cortex region controlling unilateral RSP is the premotor cortex. That is, a single limb is represented in both premotor cortices. This suggests theoretically that if the corticoreticular pathway controlling RSP is modulated by dorsal premotor cortex stimulation, there may be a change in the regulation of the intraspinal network regulating the stretch reflex. Therefore, the hypothesis in this study is that the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex in chronic stroke patients changes the severity of spasticity.

Detailed Description

Spasticity is a disorder characterized by increase in velocity-related muscle tone as a part of upper motor neuron syndrome. Although the mechanisms underlying stroke-related spasticity have not been fully understood, the current view is that spasticity is related to an imbalance between descending excitatory and inhibitory systems that regulate spinal stretch reflex and associated with abnormal intraspinal processes. The reticulospinal pathway (RSP) is at the center of this mechanism called cortical disinhibition. The dorsal RSP, which has an inhibitory effect on the spinal stretch reflex, originates from the medullary reticular formation and is under cortical control. In contrast to dorsal RSP, medial RSP which is not under the control of motor cortex originates from pontine reticular formation,and has an excitatory effect on spinal stretch reflex. The main motor cortex region controlling unilateral dorsal RSP is the premotor cortex. Unilateral RSP indirectly synapses with motor neurons via interneurons in the ventromedial intermediate zone in both halves of the spinal cord, and directly synapses with motor neurons of proximal extremity muscles. That is, a single limb is represented in both premotor cortices. This suggests theoretically that if the corticoreticular pathway controlling dorsal RSP is modulated by dorsal premotor cortex stimulation, there may be a change in the regulation of the intraspinal network regulating the stretch reflex. Furthermore, in stroke patients with severe motor impairment, the relationship between high cortical centers and the primary motor cortex is more in the form of facilitation rather than interhemispheric inhibition between the primary motor cortices. In other words, stimulation of one side premotor cortex may affect motor impairment and spasticity by affecting primary and high motor cortical centers of both hemispheres and both halves of the spinal cord. Therefore, the hypothesis in this study is that the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex in chronic stroke patients changes the severity of spasticity. Based on this hypothesis, our aim is to investigate the effect of rTMS over the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex on the severity of spasticity in patients with chronic stroke with moderate to severe upper extremity spasticity.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • ≥ 18 years
  • Stroke history ≥ 1 year
  • Having a first stroke
  • Grade 2 or 3 muscle tone according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessment in at least one of the elbow, wrist and finger flexors
  • Signed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • To have a clinical condition (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, breastfeeding, claustrophobia, epilepsy, head trauma, cranial operation history) that will constitute a contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Presence of malignancy
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Non-stroke disease or lesion affecting the sensorimotor system
  • Presence of pump/shunt
  • Advanced cognitive impairment
  • To have been rehabilitated in the last 3 months
  • Botulinum toxin injection in the last 3 months
  • Taking systemic antispastic drugs (Patients taking these drugs may be included in the study after a period of at least 3 times the half-life of the drug used if they agree to quit)
  • Previously treated with TMS

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation groupRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationOne session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment at 1 Hz frequency will be applied to the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex. Application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. 90% of the motor threshold will be used in the stimulation. Stimulation is planned for a total of 25 minutes and a total of 1500 beats in the form of 1 Hz stimulation.
Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation groupRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationOne session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment with 10 Hz frequency will be applied to the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex. Application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. 90% of the motor threshold will be used in the stimulation. Stimulation is planned for a total of 15 minutes and a total of 1500 beats in the form of a 5 seconds 10 Hz stimulation followed by a 25 seconds interval.
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation groupRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSingle session of sham application for a total of 25 minutes. Sham application will be performed by holding the probe of the device vertically to the vertex. The device will be operated at the lowest operating power of 1 to produce the same stimulation sounds like the active application. The device operating at this power is not likely to give any stimulation due to the probe being held upright.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Modified Ashworth ScalePre-intervention (baseline) and immediately after intervention (post-intervention), up to 45 minutes

The modified Ashworth Scale is a scale that clinically evaluates the presence and severity of muscle tone increase. It is an ordinal scale that evaluates spasticity at six levels between 0 and 4 (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4). The severity of spasticity increases as the score increases. Score 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone, while score 4 indicates that the affected part is rigid. Six levels between 0 and 5 (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) will be used in statistical analysis. The score of 1+ will be treated as 2, 2 as 3, 3 as 4 and 4 as 5.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
F wave parametersPre-intervention (baseline) and immediately after intervention (post-intervention), up to 45 minutes

F-wave is one of the late responses caused by antidromic stimulation of alpha motor neurons. It occurs following supramaximal electrical stimulation of peripheral motor nerves following M response. The F wave indicates the transmission from the stimulated point to the motor neuron and back to the recording electrode. Increased F wave frequency, increased F / M ratio and amplitude has been considered to indicate the increased motor neuron excitability.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

İlker Şengül

🇹🇷

İzmir, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath