MedPath

Pilot Project of Forest Bathing for Promoting Health

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intellectual Disability
Interventions
Other: Forest bathing
Registration Number
NCT05472571
Lead Sponsor
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
Brief Summary

An exploratory trial using a cuasi-experimental design aimed to improve the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. The intervention consists of 11 consecutive sessions of forest bathing (one session per week), each one lasting about 2 hours. Each session involves an easy walk through a forest area, interspersed with non-intrusive activities of contact with the surrounding nature aimed at fostering mindfulness and the use of the five senses. Data were collected at baseline, post intervention, and 7 months of follow-up.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults with intellectual disability enrolled in a specific occupational center.
  • Being informed about the study and having signed the informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Having stated their not willing to participate in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Forest bathingForest bathing-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure1 minute
Heart coherence5 minutes

Using emWave Pro Plus device and software

Perceived quality of life and wellbeing30 minutes

Using INICO-FEAPS questionnaire (Verdugo Alonso et al., 2013): Scale for the Integral Evaluation of the Quality of Life of people with intellectual or developmental disability, developed by the University Institute for Community Integration (INICO) and the Spanish Confederation of Organizations for People with Intellectual or Developmental Disability (FEAPS).

It is a self-report tool that consists of 72 four-point Likert-type items divided among 8 dimensions: self-determination, rights, emotional wellbeing, social inclusion, personal development, interpersonal relationships, material well-being, and physical well-being. Each dimension is composed of nine items. Each subscale score is calculated by summing up the score for each of the nine items, and a total score is then calculated by summing up the scale scores. Higher scores are associated to better quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Physiological Equivalent Temperature10 minutes

Following Höppe (1999) procedure

Barriers and facilitators2 hours

Field diary

Thermic perception3 minutes

Using questionnaire published in previous studies (Teli et al., 2012; Trebilcock et al., 2017), that includes 3 items to assess thermal sensation vote (TMV) (7-point Likert scale), one item to assess thermal preference vote (TPV) (3-point scale), one item to assess the feeling of comfort (closed-answer), one item to get clothing information (closed-answer), and one item to evaluate the feeling of tiredness (3-point scale). The answers to these questions put the PET value (outcome 4) into context and help interpret it.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Universidad de Navarra

🇪🇸

Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath