Pilot Project of Forest Bathing for Promoting Health
- Conditions
- Intellectual Disability
- Interventions
- Other: Forest bathing
- Registration Number
- NCT05472571
- Lead Sponsor
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
- Brief Summary
An exploratory trial using a cuasi-experimental design aimed to improve the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. The intervention consists of 11 consecutive sessions of forest bathing (one session per week), each one lasting about 2 hours. Each session involves an easy walk through a forest area, interspersed with non-intrusive activities of contact with the surrounding nature aimed at fostering mindfulness and the use of the five senses. Data were collected at baseline, post intervention, and 7 months of follow-up.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- Adults with intellectual disability enrolled in a specific occupational center.
- Being informed about the study and having signed the informed consent document.
- Having stated their not willing to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Forest bathing Forest bathing -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Systolic and diastolic blood pressure 1 minute Heart coherence 5 minutes Using emWave Pro Plus device and software
Perceived quality of life and wellbeing 30 minutes Using INICO-FEAPS questionnaire (Verdugo Alonso et al., 2013): Scale for the Integral Evaluation of the Quality of Life of people with intellectual or developmental disability, developed by the University Institute for Community Integration (INICO) and the Spanish Confederation of Organizations for People with Intellectual or Developmental Disability (FEAPS).
It is a self-report tool that consists of 72 four-point Likert-type items divided among 8 dimensions: self-determination, rights, emotional wellbeing, social inclusion, personal development, interpersonal relationships, material well-being, and physical well-being. Each dimension is composed of nine items. Each subscale score is calculated by summing up the score for each of the nine items, and a total score is then calculated by summing up the scale scores. Higher scores are associated to better quality of life.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Physiological Equivalent Temperature 10 minutes Following Höppe (1999) procedure
Barriers and facilitators 2 hours Field diary
Thermic perception 3 minutes Using questionnaire published in previous studies (Teli et al., 2012; Trebilcock et al., 2017), that includes 3 items to assess thermal sensation vote (TMV) (7-point Likert scale), one item to assess thermal preference vote (TPV) (3-point scale), one item to assess the feeling of comfort (closed-answer), one item to get clothing information (closed-answer), and one item to evaluate the feeling of tiredness (3-point scale). The answers to these questions put the PET value (outcome 4) into context and help interpret it.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Universidad de Navarra
🇪🇸Pamplona, Navarra, Spain