Comparison of treatment outcomes of lower jaw bone fracture managed using two different surgical methods.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: T799- Unspecified early complication oftrauma
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/10/016081
- Lead Sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All patients with unilateral or bilateral subcondylar fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation , patients age >18 years, will be included in the study group.
Exclusion Criteria
patient refusing consent, pregnant ladies, paediatric patients, age <18 years, condylar head fracture, patient who cannot come for follow up, medically compromised patients will not be included in the study group.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the time taken after reduction of fracture in plate fixation for one trapezoidal plate and two non parallel straight miniplates.Timepoint: Intraoperatively, time starts after reduction of fracture fragments till the completion plate fixation with screws.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the loss of reduction, and complications, using one trapezoidal plate versus two nonparallel straight miniplates.Timepoint: 6 months