Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05031117
NCT05031117CompletedNot Applicable

Comparative Study Between Dural Puncture Epidural Technique and Conventional Epidural Technique During Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

Cairo University2 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: January 10, 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
50
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
incidence of bilateral sacral blockade

Study Overview

Brief Summary

25G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique will be compared with Conventional Standard Lumbar Epidural Technique During Anesthesia of Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age: 25-55 years old.
  • Height: 165 cm.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient Refusal.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Deformity of lumbar vertebrae.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

incidence of bilateral sacral blockade

Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Reham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman

Anesthesia lecturer M.D.

Cairo University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique For... | Clinical Trial