跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02602093
NCT02602093Unknown不适用

(Cost) Effectiveness of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy vs. Open Microdiscectomy for Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 682 人开始时间: 2016年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
682
试验地点
1
主要终点
Changes on the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain

研究概览

简要总结

Rationale: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LSRS) is caused by a herniated lumbar nucleus pulposus (HNP) and the estimated annual incidence in The Netherlands ranges between 60,000 to 75,000 people. Open microdiscectomy is the standard surgical technique.

In recent years, several surgical techniques have been developed including, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). While PTED is gaining popularity in The Netherlands, evidence of its effects is lacking, leading to a heated debate. The current position of Zorginstituut Nederland (ZiN) is that there is insufficient evidence to support its use; therefore, PTED is not financially covered. The consequence is, patients are forced to pay the costs of treatment themselves. This study is expected to provide the necessary data to answer the question regarding effects and costs of PTED vs. open microdiscectomy, and help resolve the current debate.

详细描述

Rationale: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LSRS) is caused by a herniated lumbar nucleus pulposus (HNP) and the estimated annual incidence in The Netherlands ranges between 60,000 to 75,000 people. Open microdiscectomy is the standard surgical technique.

In recent years, several surgical techniques have been developed including, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). While PTED is gaining popularity in The Netherlands, evidence of its effects is lacking, leading to a heated debate. The current position of Zorginstituut Nederland (ZiN) is that there is insufficient evidence to support its use; therefore, PTED is not financially covered. The consequence is, patients are forced to pay the costs of treatment themselves. This study is expected to provide the necessary data to answer the question regarding effects and costs of PTED vs. open microdiscectomy, and help resolve the current debate. Objective: To determine the effects and costs of PTED vs. open microdiscectomy. Study design: Pragmatic, multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) with subsequent observational study once sufficient subjects have been recruited for the RCT.

Study population: In total, 682 subjects are to be included, with including 50 patients in the PTED-group per surgeon who will learn the procedure "the learning curve". Therefore, for the 3 surgeons who will learn the technique, the first 50 patients who will undergo PTED (150 total) will be analyzed seperatly.

The inclusion criteria are as follows: subjects 18-70 years of age with > 10 weeks of radiating pain with- or without motor or sensory loss in the leg, or with > 6 weeks of excessive radiating pain and no tendency for any clinical improvement and strong patient preference for surgery. There must also be an indication for an operation and a MRI demonstrating lumbar disc herniation with nerve compression with or without concomitant spinal or lateral recess stenosis or sequestration.

Participants must also have sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •10 weeks of radiating pain with- or without motor or sensory loss in the leg, or with > 6weeks of excessive radiating pain and no tendency for any clinical improvement and strong patient preference for surgery;
  • •Indication for an operation according to consensus;
  • •MRI demonstrating lumbar disc herniation with nerve compression with or without concomitant spinal or lateral recess stenosis or sequestration;
  • •Sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language in order to complete forms and follow instructions independently.

排除标准

  • •Previous surgery on the same or adjacent disc level;
  • •Cauda equina syndrome (CES);
  • •Spondylytic or degenerative spondylolisthesis;
  • •Pregnancy;
  • •Severe comorbid medical or psychiatric disorder (ASA>2);
  • •Severe caudal or cranial sequestration;
  • •Moving abroad at short notice

研究组 & 干预措施

Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy

Active Comparator

Surgery: Patients will undergo Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy.

干预措施: Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy (Procedure)

Open Microdiscectomy

Active Comparator

Surgery: Patients will undergo conventional micro discectomy.

干预措施: Open Microdiscectomy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Changes on the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain

时间窗: Baseline, Day after surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery NRS was added for internal validation

The pain intensity in the leg will be measured on a scale from 0 to 100 mm

次要结局

  • Changes on the Oswestry Disability Index(Baseline, Day after surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months , 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery)
  • Costs of treatment measured using cost questionnaires filled out by the patients(Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and , 12 and 24 months after surgery)
  • Changes on the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain(Baseline, Day after surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery NRS was added for internal validation)
  • Changes on the Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale.(Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery. NRS was added for internal validation)
  • Changes on the EuroQoL (EQ-5D)(Baseline, Day after surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 and 24 months after surgery)
  • Perceived recovery(Day after surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery)
  • Patient satisfaction(2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery)
  • Changes on the SF-36(Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery)
  • Complications(through study completion, up to 1, 2 year and 5 of follow-up)
  • Physical Examination(Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months after surgery)

研究者

发起方
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

P.S. Gadjradj

MD

Erasmus Medical Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验