跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04603768
NCT04603768已完成不适用

Comparison of Theraband, Co-contraction and Isometric Exercises in Patients With Chronic Frozen Shoulder

Riphah International University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2019年12月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
36
试验地点
1
主要终点
Numeric Pain rating scale (NPRS)

研究概览

简要总结

This project was a Randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of in patients with chronic frozen shoulder theraband, isometric and co-contraction exercises so that we can have best treatment option for patients with chronic frozen shoulder. upper cross syndrome, duration was of 6months,convenient sampling was done, subject following eligibility criteria from DHQ hospital Sheikhupura, were randomly allocated in three groups via lottery method, baseline assessment was done, Group A participants were given baseline treatment along with theraband exercises , Group B participants were given baseline treatment along with co-contraction exercises and Group C were given baseline treatment along with isometric exercises on 3rd and 6th week, post intervention assessment was done via, Numeric pain rating scale(NPRS),Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI) and goniometric measurements of shoulder ranges ,3 sessions per week were given, data was analyzed by using SPSS version 26.

详细描述

Frozen shoulder is among the most commonly reported problems to physicians, orthopedics and physical therapists. Even before reporting to clinics there is long history of using over the counter pain killers. Pain avoidance behaviors let the joint stiff so much that a clinician help is sought. Most times the cause of frozen shoulder is not known, therefore is termed as 'idiopathic frozen shoulder'.There is huge literature regarding the management of frozen shoulder and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in treatment options. In modern age of health care, it is common goal of every health care to make patient self-sufficient as early as possible. The self-care models have tremendous advantages. The current study has compared the use of theraband, co-contraction and isometric exercises. The current study was novel in a way that there is limited literature about treating shoulder hypomobility with physical strengthening exercises. All three methods were employed to see if they improve ranges along with accompanying pain and disability.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Idiopathic with 6 month chronicity.
  • Patients with AROM/PROM less than or equal to 90 degrees.
  • Affected shoulder has not more than 90 degrees of abduction & 50% decreased external rotation as compared to normal side/normal ROM values.

排除标准

  • Traumatic & diabetic.
  • Patient with any cervical or thoracic problem.
  • Patients with any intra-articular injection in glenohumeral joint.
  • Patients with rotator cuff complete tear.
  • Patients with any other serious pathology/red flags

结局指标

主要结局

Numeric Pain rating scale (NPRS)

时间窗: 3rd day

Changes from base Line Numeric Pain rating scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain

次要结局

  • SPADI(3rd day)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验