Immediate management of patients with ruptured aneurysm: open versus endovascular repair
- Conditions
- Abdominal aortic aneurysmCirculatory SystemAortic aneurysm and dissection
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN48334791
- Lead Sponsor
- Imperial College London (UK)
- Brief Summary
2009 protocol in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19464199 2009 protocol in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20184048 2014 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24418950 2014 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24469620 2014 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485843 2015 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627357 2015 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25855369 2015 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104471 2015 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981698 2017 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138135 2018 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503083 2018 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860967
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 600
1. Both males and females, over the age of 50 years
2. Clinical suspicion of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after review in Accident and Emergency (or other hospital unit)
1. Patients with known connective tissue disorders (e.g., Marfan syndrome) where endovascular repair may not be beneficial
2. Patients with known previous repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, because procedures either open or endovascular are likely to be very complex and there are no guidelines for anatomical restriction to repair
3. Deeply unconscious and moribund patients since the chances of recovery are minimal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method