Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2017/12/010980
CTRI/2017/12/010980CompletedNot Applicable

A comparative study between trasplantation of autologus non-cultured epidermal cell suspension prepared by conventional laboratory method versus four chamber method in stable vitiligo

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research1 site in 1 country41 target enrollmentStarted: October 30, 2014Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
41
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Extent of repigmentation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Non cultured epidermal cell suspension (NCES) is a well established cellular grafting technique in stable vitiligo. However, NCES preparation by Lab conventionally involves creation of laboratory facilities and need for special equipments. There is no need for trypsin inhibitors, pipettes, autoclaved tips, centrifuge tube and centrifuge machine in Four chamber (FC) method. With the introduction of  FC method the clinician’s in a small set up who do not have access to laboratory facilities will be able to perform vitiligo surgeries at peripheral level at a minimal cost. A total of 30 stable vitiligo patients with bilaterally symmetrical patches or multiple patches in same anatomical area were recruited for the study. Using random number tables the matched patches were treated with either conventional NCES or NCES prepared by FC method in same patient. Each patient was evaluated at 4, 8, 16 weeks post surgery by a blinded observer in regard to extent of repigmentation, colour match, change in patient satisfaction with patient global assessment (PGA) questionnaire. In the study at the follow up period of 16 weeks, the extent of repigmentation was excellent 36.6% in group A compared to 34.1%in group B which showed no statistical significance (p=1.00).  Marked repigmentation was also seen in in 34.1% of patches in each group. Diffuse repigmentation was seen in 29 (70.7%) out of 41 lesions in group A and 31 (75.6%) out of 41 lesions in group B (p=0.62). On resistant sites repigmentation was good, 33.3% in group A and 27.8% in group B (p=0.72); while it was excellent, 22.2% each in group A and B. Thirty four paired patches were of  either vitiligo vulgaris and acrofacialvitiligo) in which repigmentation was good, 38.2 % in group A and 35.3 % in group B (p=0.80); while it was excellent in 32.4 % in group A and 29.4 % in group B (p=0.79). There was also no statistical difference in the pattern of repigmentation, colour match and PGA. It can be concluded that preparation of NCES by FC method is efficacious and a cost effective cellular transplantation technique in stable vitiligo with results comparable to conventional NCES.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Random Number Table
Masking
Outcome Assessor Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
10.00 Year(s) to 50.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects with clinical diagnosis of focal, segmental or generalized vitiligo which has been stable for more than 1year.
  • •Vitiligo patches should be in same anatomical region bilaterally or two or more patches in the same anatomical region separated by a stretch of normal skin (at least 1cm).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Age less than 10 years 2)Pregnancy 3)Patient with actively spreading vitiligo 4)Appearance of new lesions 5)History of Koebnerization 6)History of hypertrophic scars or keloidal tendency 7)Bleeding disorders 8)Patients with unrealistic expectation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Extent of repigmentation

Time Frame: 16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pattern of repigmentation.(Correlation extent of repigmentation with type of vitiligo and site of surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Research institution and hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Four chamber method in vitiligo surgery, a... | Clinical Trial