Group cognitive behaviour therapy for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators in a self-referred outpatient setting: Treatment effects in relation to patient characteristics and treatment integrity.
- Conditions
- AggressionImpulse control disorder10021563
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON50752
- Lead Sponsor
- GGZ Westelijk Noord-Brabant (Halsteren)
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 180
General study:
Male
Age 18 to 65
Aggression problems
Self-referred treatmentPart of the study (stress and cognitive bias):
Age 18 to 45
No medical coronary conditionPartners:
Age 18 years or older
In an intimatie relationship with patientditTrail
Aggression occurs exclusively in relation to substance abuse
Severe psychopathology, for example, psychosis
Moderate to severe intellectual disability
Psychopathy is a contra-indication for group treatment, individual NMDHL
treatment can be indicated (thus, psychopathic patients are excluded)
Autism as primary diagnosis.Partners:
Moderate to severe intellectual disability
á*BBá*
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The main study parameter is change in the frequency and severity of aggressive<br /><br>behaviour after NMDHL treatment. Aggressive behaviour will be evaluated by pre-<br /><br>and post-therapy administration of two self-report questionnaires and one<br /><br>partner questionnaire. Predictors that are hypothesised to be of influence on<br /><br>treatment effect are offender subtype, psychiatric co-morbidity, personality<br /><br>traits, stress reactivity, cognitive bias, motivation and treatment integrity.<br /><br>Offender subtype, psychiatric co-morbidity, personality traits, motivation and<br /><br>treatment integrity are assessed by self-report measures, a researcher-rated<br /><br>risk assessment instrument B-SAFER, semi-structured interview, and audiotaping<br /><br>sessions. Stress response is measured by cortisol level and a-amylase level<br /><br>before and after a stress induction test MAST. Social-cognitive bias is<br /><br>measured by FaceGen Modeller test. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Treatment integrity of NMDHL treatment will be assessed. In order to score<br /><br>treatment integrity an intervention checklist will be developed. NMDHL<br /><br>treatment sessions are being audiotaped and coded by means of the intervention<br /><br>checklist. The intervention checklist concerns protocol adherence as well as<br /><br>non-specific therapeutic techniques.</p><br>