MedPath

Effectiveness Comparison of 3D-Printed and Conventional Ear Tip Comfort in Individuals With Hearing Loss

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Hearing Aids
Hearing Loss, Bilateral Sensorineural
3D Printing
Registration Number
NCT07228845
Lead Sponsor
University of Arizona
Brief Summary

Access to affordable and timely hearing healthcare remains a major challenge for many individuals, partly due to the high cost and long turnaround time. This study will explore whether 3D-printed ear tips perform as well as or better than standard ear tips in terms of sound quality, comfort, and fit over a prolonged duration in a sample of individuals with bilateral hearing loss. It will also compare how long each method takes to make and how much each costs.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • Bilateral, symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss, with thresholds between normal and severe degree of hearing loss
  • Normal otoscopy: patent ear canals with normal appearing eardrums and aerated middle ear, bilaterally.
  • English speaking.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Self reported history of extensive or current outer or middle ear pathology.
  • Self reported history of extensive outer or middle ear surgery.
  • Self reported history of neurological or cognitive disorder.
  • Active ear infection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Real Ear Measuresthrough study completion, an average of 1 week

Evaluation of ear canal acoustics with participant wearing a hearing aid and eartip type (3d party, in-house\_Resin, in-house\_FlexResin). A thin microphone tube is placed in the ear canal to measure the average amount gain (dB SPL) across various frequencies (250-8000Hz) while the participant sits in front of a speaker playing sound samples. Results are recorded in gain (dB SPL) across frequencies.

Outer EAR comfort questionnairethrough study completion, an average of 1 week

A validated questionnaire, Outer EAR, will be used to elicit patient perception of physical comfort, acoustic comfort, quality of voice, and overall self-perceived satisfaction. Includes 6 items (5 levels) , with 5 representing best possible function/rating.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Costthrough study completion, an average of week

The total raw cost ($, dollars US)

Timethrough study completion, an average of week

Time-to-subject for each ear tip type

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Arizona Hearing Clinic

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

The University of Arizona Hearing Clinic
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
Bryan Wong, AuD, PhD
Contact
5206268549
bryanwong@arizona.edu

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.