Effectiveness Comparison of 3D-Printed and Conventional Ear Tip Comfort in Individuals With Hearing Loss
- Conditions
- Hearing AidsHearing Loss, Bilateral Sensorineural3D Printing
- Registration Number
- NCT07228845
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Arizona
- Brief Summary
Access to affordable and timely hearing healthcare remains a major challenge for many individuals, partly due to the high cost and long turnaround time. This study will explore whether 3D-printed ear tips perform as well as or better than standard ear tips in terms of sound quality, comfort, and fit over a prolonged duration in a sample of individuals with bilateral hearing loss. It will also compare how long each method takes to make and how much each costs.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- Bilateral, symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss, with thresholds between normal and severe degree of hearing loss
- Normal otoscopy: patent ear canals with normal appearing eardrums and aerated middle ear, bilaterally.
- English speaking.
- Self reported history of extensive or current outer or middle ear pathology.
- Self reported history of extensive outer or middle ear surgery.
- Self reported history of neurological or cognitive disorder.
- Active ear infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Real Ear Measures through study completion, an average of 1 week Evaluation of ear canal acoustics with participant wearing a hearing aid and eartip type (3d party, in-house\_Resin, in-house\_FlexResin). A thin microphone tube is placed in the ear canal to measure the average amount gain (dB SPL) across various frequencies (250-8000Hz) while the participant sits in front of a speaker playing sound samples. Results are recorded in gain (dB SPL) across frequencies.
Outer EAR comfort questionnaire through study completion, an average of 1 week A validated questionnaire, Outer EAR, will be used to elicit patient perception of physical comfort, acoustic comfort, quality of voice, and overall self-perceived satisfaction. Includes 6 items (5 levels) , with 5 representing best possible function/rating.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost through study completion, an average of week The total raw cost ($, dollars US)
Time through study completion, an average of week Time-to-subject for each ear tip type
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The University of Arizona Hearing Clinic
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
The University of Arizona Hearing Clinic🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United StatesBryan Wong, AuD, PhDContact5206268549bryanwong@arizona.edu
