Clinical Performance Evaluation of Two Different Dental Implants
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Edentulism
- Interventions
- Device: dental implant-supported restoration
- Registration Number
- NCT03845335
- Lead Sponsor
- Elite Odontoiatrica
- Brief Summary
In brief, the aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the patient satisfaction and the clinical performance of two types of implants: 1) HA-coated hybrid dental implant and 2) non-coated moderately rough dental implant. The comparison will be studied during a routine implant placement of experienced dental implantologists.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 600
Inclusion Criteria
- Signed informed consent to participate to the present investigation
- Psychological appropriateness and good compliance to dentist instructions
- Patient who have been selected for implant therapy by an experienced surgeon.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HA-coated hybrid implant dental implant-supported restoration Patient allocated to this group will receive an iMAX® Hyaluronic Acid-coated hybrid dental implant for their dental implant-supported restoration. Moderately rough implant dental implant-supported restoration Patient allocated in this group will receive an iMAX® non-coated moderately rough dental implant with a machined neck their dental implant-supported restoration.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Survival Rate 12 months after implant placement Cumulative implant survival rate
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Elite Odontoiatrica Opera
🇮🇹Opera, MI, Italy
Elite Odontoiatrica Milano
🇮🇹Milano, MI, Italy
Elite Odontoiatrica Caronno
🇮🇹Caronno Pertusella, VA, Italy
Elite Odontoiatrica Magenta
🇮🇹Magenta, MI, Italy