跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05336318
NCT05336318招募中不适用

Evaluation of a Peer Supported Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients

University of Leipzig3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2021年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
180
试验地点
3
主要终点
Assessing post traumatic growth of mentors and change

研究概览

简要总结

The present bicentric study has the aim to investigate the effectiveness of the peer supported mentoring program 'Peer2Me' with regard to psychosocial parameters using a prospective Comprehensive Cohort Design. Over a period of three months, acutely ill patients in the intervention group are accompanied by a mentor with the same disease and of similar age. Patients in the control group receive a one-time consultation. Before and after the intervention, mentors and mentees are interviewed about their psychosocial distress and quality of life.

详细描述

After successful piloting of the mentoring program "Peer2Me", the mentoring program developed by us is now to be implemented and evaluated in a large-scale study in a second step, in order to be able to derive clinically relevant results.

A total of 180 acutely ill adolescent and young cancer patients (AYA) between the ages of 18 and 39 will be included in the study (intervention and control group). Again, young former cancer patients who have completed treatment will act as mentors and accompany acutely ill AYAs in the period after diagnosis for a period of three months. Prior to their assignment, the mentors take part in a training course, which includes the teaching of suitable conversation techniques, core topics in dealing with the cancer and advice on further care structures. Patients in the control group receive 30 minutes of standardized counseling regarding psychosocial care needs, including appropriate informational materials, during AYA consultation hours at both clinic sites. The study includes three measurement time points: t1: before the intervention; t2: after the end of the intervention; t3: 3 months after the end of the intervention. At all time points, participants will be surveyed using standardized questionnaires. With the help of these data and a comprehensive statistical analysis, the investigators want to make valid statements regarding the effects of peer mentoring on changes in psychological well-being as well as on social support and coping with illness.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 39 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Cancer disease between the ages of 18 and 39 (all tumor entities)
  • completion of acute treatment at least 2 years ago (mentors)
  • curative prognosis
  • Native language German or fluent German speaker
  • first cancer diagnosis in the last 6 months (mentees, all tumor entities)
  • curative prognosis

排除标准

  • existing and already diagnosed psychiatric disease, ongoing psychotherapy and/or existing suicidal tendency
  • palliative treatment approach

结局指标

主要结局

Assessing post traumatic growth of mentors and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention

The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) measures the extent to which patients have experienced positive changes regarding cancer. The questionnaire contains 21 items in the five dimensions: new opportunities, relationship with others, personal strength, appreciation of life, and spiritual change. Using a three-point Likert scale, patients indicate the extent to which the item responses apply. Item scores are summed to form a total score, with higher scores indicating higher posttraumatic growth.

Assessing Empathy of mentors and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention

The Saarbrücken Personality Questionnaire on Empathy is the German adaptation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. The SPF is a questionnaire for self-assessment of one's own empathic abilities and consists of 16 items that measure both the cognitive and the emotional dimension of empathy on four subscales: imagination, empathic distress, empathic sympathy, and perspective taking. A five-point Likert scale (1- never to 5- always) is used to assess the extent to which the statements are true.

Life satisfaction of mentors and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention

The FLZ-M is a valid instrument that measures the subjective assessment of satisfaction in various areas of life. Life satisfaction is assessed using the two modules "general life satisfaction" and "satisfaction with health", each with eight items and one overall item. Subjective satisfaction and importance are assessed on a five-point Likert scale (0 = "dissatisfied" to 4 = "very satisfied").

Life satisfaction of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The FLZ-M is a valid instrument that measures the subjective assessment of satisfaction in various areas of life. Life satisfaction is assessed using the two modules "general life satisfaction" and "satisfaction with health", each with eight items and one overall item. Subjective satisfaction and importance are assessed on a five-point Likert scale (0 = "dissatisfied" to 4 = "very satisfied").

Coping of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

Self-efficacy in coping with cancer can be defined as the confidence of a cancer patient in his or her ability to develop adaptive coping behavior. The German version of the short form of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-B-D) uses 14 items to describe coping behavior in the context of cancer. Patients estimate on a nine-point Likert scale how confident they are in performing certain behaviors. By summing all 14 item scores, a sum score is obtained, with high scores indicating high confidence in the ability to perform the coping behavior.

Anxiety of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The Generalized Anxiety Scale measures symptoms of generalized anxiety disorders and the symptom severity of generalized anxiety on a four-point Likert scale using seven items. The individual item scores are summed to a total score, which can assume values between 0 and 21 points.

Depressive symptoms of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The Patient Health Questionnaire measures depressive symptoms on a four-point Likert scale using nine items. The PHQ-9 can be evaluated both categorically and by summing up the item characteristics. The scale sum value can reach values between 1 and 27.

Self-efficacy of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The General Self-Efficacy Expectancy Scale is a self-assessment procedure with 10 items for assessing general optimistic self-convictions. It measures the expectation of subjective competence to cope with difficult situations such as cancer. A four-point Likert scale is used to ascertain the extent to which patients agree with the statements. The individual test score is calculated by summing up all ten items.

Social support of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The Berlin Social Support Scales measure six dimensions of social support in a multidimensional approach: perceived social support, received social support, provided social support, need and search for social support, and protective cushioning in the sense of protecting others from stress.

Health literacy of mentees and change

时间窗: Baseline and 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention

The HLS-EU-Q16 measures health literacy with 16 items and was developed from the long version of the HLS-EU-Q47. The items refer to various tasks and activities related to health care, disease prevention or health promotion. Respondents rate in each case how easy they think the corresponding task or activity is ("very easy," "fairly easy," "fairly difficult," "very difficult"). A sum score from 0 to 16 can be calculated, and the latter can be classified as insufficient (\<9), problematic (9-12), and sufficient (13-16) health literacy.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University of Leipzig
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Anja Mehnert

Prof. Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf

University of Leipzig

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验