Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00969735
NCT00969735
Completed
Phase 4

Cryoenergy Or Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (COR Trial)

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentJuly 2009

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Proportion of patients without AF recurrences longer than 2 minutes
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter versus the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.

Detailed Description

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a radiofrequency catheter is the most widespread technique for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. These procedures are difficult and time-consuming, because they require precise catheter manipulation and multiple radiofrequency applications. Thus, alternative techniques are being investigated to simplify the procedure. Recently, a cryoenergy balloon catheter has been developed for PV isolation (Arctic Front®, Cryocath Technologies). When this catheter is deployed at the PV antrum, it can create a circumferential lesion around the PV ostium by delivering a single cryoenergy application. An implantable loop recorder for AF detection has been made available (Reveal XT®, Medtronic). It may help taking clinical decisions regarding anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy and, at the same time, it may be a powerful tool to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies. This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter vs. the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2009
End Date
May 2012
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nicasio Perez Castellano

MD, PhD

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Symptomatic recurrent paroxysmal AF (\>2 episodes in the last 6 months), and
  • Refractory to one or more class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, and
  • PV anatomy consisting of 4 single PV, with the long diameter of the right superior PV ostium ≤ 20 mm.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age: \< 18 or \> 75 year-old
  • Prior AF ablation
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant acute illness
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Moderate to severe valvular heart disease
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Left atrium \> 50 mm (anteroposterior diameter, parasternal long-axis view)
  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Proportion of patients without AF recurrences longer than 2 minutes

Time Frame: At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Proportion of pulmonary veins remaining isolated(At the end of the ablation procedure)
  • Time to first AF recurrence longer than 2 minutes(Within the first 12 months from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation, and without the use of any blanking period))
  • Cumulative burden of AF (number of AF episodes longer than 2 minutes)(At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation))
  • Cumulative burden of AF (percentage of time in AF)(At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation))
  • Proportion of patients with episodes of regular atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter requiring treatment with drugs, electrical cardioversion or ablation.(Within the first 12 months from ablation)
  • Quality of Life and symptom status(At the 12th month from ablation)
  • Proportion of patients with procedure-related complications(Within the first 12 months from ablation)
  • Procedure time (minutes elapsed from the first puncture of the femoral vein to the removal of the last catheter)(At the end of the ablation procedure)
  • Ablation time (minutes elapsed from the onset of the first energy delivery to the end of the last energy delivery).(At the end of the ablation procedure)
  • Fluoroscopy time (minutes of fluoroscopy used during the entire ablation procedure)(At the end of the ablation procedure)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials