跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01065532
NCT01065532已完成不适用

Healing Responses After Treatment of Bare Metal Stent Restenosis With Implantation of an Everolimus-eluting Xience V Stent Versus Use of a Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon: Optical Coherence Tomography Study

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2009年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
Stent strut coverage and stent strut apposition(assessed with OCT)

研究概览

简要总结

Different healing responses after treatment of bare metal stent restenosis with implantation of an everolimus-eluting Xience V stent (Abbott Vascular) versus use of a paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent Please balloon (BBraun): an optical coherence tomography study.

A prospective, single-centre, randomized clinical trial with clinical, angiographic and OCT follow-up at 9 months.

详细描述

Background: The optimal treatment of bare metal stent restenosis (implantation of a drug-eluting stent, simple balloon dilatation, CABG) is still not defined. The most used option nowadays is the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). However, this procedure implies application of a double metal layer in the vessel wall, which is linked to delayed healing. Furthermore there might be a higher risk of malapposition of both struts of the bare metal and the newly implanted drug-eluting stents. These phenomenon's might give rise to an increased risk of stent thrombosis in this patient population. Recently, drug-eluting balloons (DEB) were proposed as a new treatment strategy for bare metal stent restenosis. The initial results of this technique look promising.

Aim: To compare healing processes after treatment of BMS ISR with balloon dilatation using DEB versus implantation of DES.

Methods: 50 patients with BMS restenosis (SVG and bifurcation lesions will be excluded) will be randomized into two treatment groups: SeQuent Please drug-eluting balloon dilatation (group I) versus implantation of an everolimus-eluting Xience V stent (group II). At 9 months, a control angiography with OCT pullback of the treated segment is planned.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient older than 18 years
  • written informed consent available
  • patient eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention
  • patients with a single or multiple re-stenotic lesion(s) in a previously stented area of a coronary artery (irrelevant whether BMS or DES)
  • Target reference vessel diameter measured by QCA: 2-4 mm
  • Target lesion length measured by QCA < 24 mm
  • Target lesion stenosis measured by QCA: > 70%- < 100%
  • Patients willing to provide written informed consent prior to participation and willing and able to participate in all follow-up evaluations.

排除标准

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction of < 30%
  • Impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl)
  • Target lesion located in bifurcation
  • Previous and/or planned brachytherapy of target vessel
  • Lesion of the left main trunk > 50%, unprotected
  • Known allergies to antiplatelet, anticoagulation therapy, contrast media, paclitaxel or everolimus
  • Pregnant and/or breast-feeding females or females who intend to become pregnant (pregnancy test required)
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year
  • Patients who intend to have a major surgical intervention within 6 months of enrolment in the study.
  • Patient currently enrolled in other investigational device or drug trial
  • Patient not able or willing to adhere to follow-up visits
  • Patients who previously participated in this study. -

结局指标

主要结局

Stent strut coverage and stent strut apposition(assessed with OCT)

时间窗: 9 months

次要结局

  • Lumen Loss (in-stent) at 9 months In-segment Late Lumen Loss at 9 months Cumulative MACE rate at 9 months Stent thrombosis at all follow-ups Target vessel revascularisation (TVR) at 12 months Device success(9 months, 12 months, yearly until 5 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验