Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures (SPRINT)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tibial Fracture
- Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Enrollment
- 1200
- Locations
- 16
- Primary Endpoint
- Necessity for additional operation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the rate of healing of a tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail based on whether or not the bone was reamed prior to nail insertion.
Detailed Description
Patients with tibia fractures that are amenable to being treated with both a reamed and an unreamed nail will be randomized via telephone to one of the two groups. These patients then will be followed for a year with clinical, as well as subjective, outcome follow-up questionnaires. Time to healing, as well as repeat interventions and adverse events, will be tracked. The rationale for doing a large sample size multi-center trial is the hope that a clear answer to whether or not one of these two methods is significantly better than the other will become apparent and thus aid surgeons in making a more informed operative treatment choice.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Fractured tibia requiring fixation using an intramedullary nail
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Necessity for additional operation
Time Frame: Months 6, 9, and 12
Secondary Outcomes
- Return to work, functional status, and health-related quality of life(Months 6, 9, and 12)