"ED-STEADI:" The Emergency Department Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries Program (A Pilot Study)

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

This prospective, randomized controlled study will be conducted when there is a member of the research team available to consent patients at a Level I Trauma Center with approximately 90,000 annual ED visits across all age groups. Each potentially eligible patient will be identified by the research team and approached in the ED. Consented and enrolled patients will be assigned a study identification number and the enrollment documented by a member of the research team in the ED's electronic medical record after subjects are confirmed to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects will be assigned randomly (by using a computer generated sequence) to either the control or intervention study arms. Subjects in the control arm will have demographic data collected, a baseline Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES) screening completed and two STEADI Tool Kit mobility tests administered (the "TUG" \[Timed Up and GO\] and the 30-Second Chair Stand test). The FES and VES are validated surveys measuring fall concern and functional decline. The research team will advise them that they have a risk of falling as identified by inclusion criteria and that we are advising them to take action to prevent future falls. They will be given the brochure, "What YOU Can Do to Prevent Falls," that is standardized information recommended in the STEADI Tool Kit for Health Care Providers by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Subjects in the active arm will also have demographic data collected, a baseline FES and VES screening completed, and two STEADI Tool Kit mobility tests administered (the "TUG" \[Timed Up and GO\] and the 30-Second Chair Stand test). Their risk of falling will be reviewed with them using a bedside decision aid indicating what they can do to decrease their risk. Particular attention will be given to personalizing their fall risk. The fall prevention management options will be presented in a value neutral fashion, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each option. They will have an opportunity to discuss what outcomes are the most important to them and choose the management options from the list provided that are the most valuable to them. Study and treatment team members will then work with this agreed upon selection to provide reliable intervention and outpatient follow up to improve the gains that can be realized in an integrated healthcare system. If the participant chooses to do their own home safety evaluation, they will be provided with a checklist to guide them in looking for hazards in their home and how to fix them. The patient will keep the original copy of their decision aid with their agreed-upon selected treatment options, and a copy of it will be placed in the subject's study file. All actions that are in response to the subject's selected plan (prescriptions, appointments, etc.) will also be documented in the study file. Both groups will have phone follow-up at 6 weeks post ED visit, and then again at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months to collect self-reported data about goal completion and fall history. The last phone follow-up will include an exit FES and VES reassessment. All participants in both arms will have data collected about their inpatient and outpatient visits throughout the network during the study period to corroborate their self-report (e.g., occupational therapy, physical therapy visits, hospital admissions or ER visits for injuries related to a fall, etc.).

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

• Gender differences in use of the decision tool(12 months)