MedPath

Shared Medical Appointment for COPD Patients (SMA-COPD)

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
Registration Number
NCT07128745
Lead Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a behavior change intervention, delivered through a shared medical appointment (SMA) model, can improve self-management behaviors and health outcomes among community-based patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

i) Can a BCW-based intervention strategy that integrates shared medical appointments increase COPD patients' self-management behaviors? ii) Does this strategy relate to reduced acute exacerbations, slower lung function decline, and improved health-related quality of life?

Researchers will compare the shared medical appointment group and the usual care group to see if integrating SMA improves behavioral and clinical outcomes.

Participants will i) Take part in group-based shared medical appointments once every two months for a total of three sessions over six months, led by a general practitioner, involving structured medical consultation, behavioral guidance, and peer interaction.

ii) Receive behavioral intervention based on the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework, targeting modifiable factors influencing self-management behaviors.

iii) Complete questionnaires and assessments at baseline and 6-month follow-up to evaluate changes in behavior, symptoms, and quality of life.

The study uses a three-stage mixed methods design:

i) Stage 1 involves longitudinal qualitative interviews and co-design with patients and clinicians to develop the intervention strategy.

ii) Stage 2 is a pilot study to test the feasibility and acceptable for up-coming cluster randomized controlled trial.

iii)Stage 3 is a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and mechanisms of the intervention.

Detailed Description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 100 million patients in China, with poor self-management behaviors contributing to frequent exacerbations and increased disease burden. Despite inclusion in national basic public health services, limited healthcare resources hinder effective COPD management. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) offer a promising solution by providing group-based clinical care and behavioral interventions. This study aims to develop and evaluate a behavioral intervention strategy incorporating SMAs for community-based COPD self-management.

This multi-stage mixed methods study comprises three phases. Stage 1 uses patient-provider co-design and longitudinal qualitative research methods to analyze self-management behavioral factors based on the Behavior Change Wheel theory and develop the SMA-COPD intervention. Stage 2 conducts a feasibility study to assess intervention acceptability and research procedures. Stage 3 implements a cluster randomized controlled trial across 20 community health centers, recruiting 280 COPD patients (14 per cluster, 140 per arm). The intervention group receives three monthly SMA sessions, while controls receive routine care. Primary outcomes include COPD self-management behaviors, inhaler medication adherence, and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes include inhaler technique, lung function, physical activity capacity, and number of acute exacerbations. Data collection occurs at baseline and 6 months post-intervention, with additional assessments at 6 months post-intervention completion. The study follows the RE-AIM framework to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
280
Inclusion Criteria
  • Meets the diagnostic criteria for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) according to the GOLD 2024 guidelines.
  • Diagnosed with COPD within the past year, or has had fewer than two outpatient visits for COPD management in the past year.
  • Resides in the community under the jurisdiction of the respective community health service centre.
  • Aged 40 to 80 years.
  • Has full cognitive and behavioural capacity and is able to clearly express personal will.
  • No plans for long-term travel in the next six months.
  • Has provided written informed consent and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has severe complications or other serious diseases.
  • Has limited physical activity due to comorbidities or complications.
  • Is currently participating in another clinical trial.
  • Is unsuitable for participation by the study investigators.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Self-management behaviour6 months after intervention

COPD self-management Scale. This scale comprises five dimensions: symptoms, daily life, emotions, information, and self-efficacy, with a total of 51 items. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicate better performance in the patient's self-management behaviors.

Zhang, C. H., He, G. P., Li, J. P., et al. (2011). Development and evaluation of a self-management scale for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese General Practice, 2011, 14(28), 3219-3223.

medication adherence6 months after intervention

Scale of Test of the Adherence to Inhalers (TAI). Meng, W. W., Cui, Y. N., Luo, L. J., et al. (2022). The TAI questionnaire consists of 10 items, all of which are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 point indicates "always" and 5 points indicates "never." The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with lower scores indicating poorer adherence to inhaled medication in patients. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Inhaler Adherence Test. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, (05), 423-430.

Quality of life of patients using SGRQ6 months after intervention

The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is used to assess the severity of illness in patients with pulmonary diseases. It consists of 76 items (50 items in the U.S. version) divided into three domains: Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts on Daily Life. The scoring method employs a weighted average, where higher weights indicate a more severe impact on quality of life. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire is 4 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Six-minute walk test distance6 months after intervention

The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) will be measured according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines to evaluate functional exercise capacity in people with COPD. Greater walking distance indicates better cardiopulmonary function in patients.

Frequency of acute exacerbations requiring hospitalisation6 months after intervention

Number of acute exacerbations requiring hospital readmission

Knowledge of COPD6 months after intervention

COPD knowledge will be evaluated using the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ). The BCKQ assesses knowledge across 13 key domains: COPD etiology, epidemiology, symptoms, vaccination, smoking, infections, oral/inhaled corticosteroid therapy, exercise, antibiotics, and inhaled bronchodilators. Each domain contains 5 items (65 total items), with three response options per item: "True," "False," and "Don't know." Correct answers score 1 point; higher total scores indicate better COPD-related knowledge.

Correct use of inhaled medication devices6 months after intervention

Assessed using a 10-step inhaler technique evaluation checklist adapted from Qin Qiong et al. (2016), with each step scored as 1 point for a total of 10 points, where higher scores indicate better performance in using of inhaled medication devices.

Forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1.6 months after intervention

FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second) is the maximum volume of air exhaled in the first second after a maximal inhalation, measured during a forced expiratory maneuver. It is one of the most critical indicators in pulmonary function testing. FEV1 is commonly used to assess the severity of lung function impairment in conditions such as bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Additionally, it can be combined with FVC (Forced Vital Capacity, the maximum volume of air exhaled forcefully after a full inhalation) to diagnose COPD. For instance, a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio \< 70% of the predicted value confirms a diagnosis of COPD.

Beliefs About Medicines6 months after intervention

The beliefs about medication will be assessed using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-Specific). The BMQ-Specific assesses medication concern beliefs and necessity beliefs, each measured by 5 items with scores ranging from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs in the respective dimension.

Self-Efficacy6 months after intervention

Self-efficacy will be assessed using the COPD Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES). The CSES comprises five dimensions: dyspnea management, emotional distress, physical activity, environmental/temperature factors, and safety behaviors, with a total of 31 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5), where 1 = "not confident at all" and 5 = "very confident." Higher total scores indicate greater self-efficacy in patients during physical activities.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Peking University Third Hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

Haidian District Huayuan Road Community Health Service Centre

🇨🇳

Beijing, China

Peking University Third Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.