MedPath

Combined Cingulate and Thalamic DBS for Chronic Refractory Chronic Pain

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain
Interventions
Procedure: Deep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior
Registration Number
NCT03399942
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Brief Summary

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain, by decreasing the emotional impact of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients, but the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.

The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only.

Detailed Description

Chronic pain represents a major personal and societal burden, especially for medically resistant patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sensory thalamus has been proposed for 40 years to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain, but its efficacy remains partial and unpredictable. Recently, bilateral DBS of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region involved in the integration of the affective, emotional and cognitive aspects of pain, has been successively proposed to treat few patients suffering from refractory chronic pain. In a pilot study, 16 patients treated by ACC-DBS experienced a significant improvement of their quality of life despite a slight decrease of their pain intensity, by improving the affective and emotional impacts of their chronic pain. ACC-DBS could be an alternative or complementary approach to thalamic DBS in these patients. However the consequences of chronic dACC-DBS on cognition and affects have not been studied specifically.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bilateral ACC-DBS combined with unilateral thalamic DBS in patients suffering from chronic unilateral pain, refractory to medical treatment. Secondary objective will evaluate the efficacy of this combined DBS compared to thalamic DBS only

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult patients (age 18-70 years old) suffering from chronic (duration >1 year) unilateral neuropathic pain
  • severe (VAS score >6/10)
  • with high emotional impact (HAD subscores > 10) considered as resistant to medication specific to neuropathic pain at sufficient doses and durations (including at least antiepileptics and antidepressants) and not sufficiently improved by rTMS and relevant surgical solutions.

Non inclusion criteria:

  • previous history of stroke,
  • cognitive impairment (MMSE score <24),
  • DSMIV axis I psychiatric disorder,
  • contra-indication to surgery, anesthesia or MRI;
  • patient responder to rTMS,
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
DBS-ACC ONDeep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorStart of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is ON and the second period, between M7 and M10 is OFF
DBS-ACC OFFDeep brain Stimulation of cingulum anteriorStart of stimulation of the DBS-ACC: On the first period, between M4 and M7, the DBS-ACC is OFF and the second period, between M7 and M10 is ON
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Occurence of serious adverse events.Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

description of serious adverse events

Feasibility of ACC-DBS: success the process of surgical interventionDay 0

Feasibility of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by the proportion of patients undergoing with success the process of surgical intervention Safety will be evaluated by neurological examination

Feasibility of ACC-DBS : neurological success of the process of chronic stimulationDay 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

neurological success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the neurological examination

Feasibility of ACC-DBS : psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulationDay 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

psychiatric success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the psychiatric assessment

Feasibility of ACC-DBS : cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulationDay 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

cognitive success of the process of chronic stimulation will be evaluated by the cognitive assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by EQ-5DDay 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by quality of life (EQ5D).

Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of pain intensityDay 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by pain intensity (McGill Pain Questionnaire)

Efficacy of ACC-DBS : change of quality of life by SF-36Day 0, Month 1, Month 4, Month 7, Month 10, Month 22

Efficacy of ACC-DBS will be evaluated by quality of life (SF36).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of neurosurgery

🇫🇷

Nice, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath