Comparison of two devices for securing airway
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- ASA I and II otherwise healthy patients
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2015/02/005553
- Lead Sponsor
- PGIMER Chandigarh
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Closed to Recruitment of Participants
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 90
Inclusion Criteria
The following patients will be included in the study:
Age group of 18-60 years
ASA physical status I-II
Weight between 40-90 Kgs
Those scheduled for elective surgical procedures needing tracheal intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
The following patients will be excluded from the study:
Suspected or known difficult intubation
Patients with mouth opening of less than 4 cm.
ASA III, IV or V patients.
Patients with history of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia or increased risk of aspiration.
Any contraindication to the use of muscle relaxants
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the performance of Ambu®Aura-Gain� laryngeal mask with the air-Q ILA as conduits for blind tracheal intubation in adult population.Timepoint: At the time of insertion of device.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Device insertion time, no of attempts,ease of insertion, fibre optic view, insertion time of tracheal tube, ease of insertion of tracheal tube, total time and adverse eventsTimepoint: After induction, during intubation and after intubation