Clinical Trial for Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a Echinacea/Sage Spray Compared to a Chlorhexidine/Lidocaine Spray in the Treatment of Acute Sore Throats
- Conditions
- Pharyngitis
- Interventions
- Drug: echinacea/sageDrug: chlorhexidine/lidocaine
- Registration Number
- NCT00707902
- Lead Sponsor
- A. Vogel AG
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to show non-inferiority of an echinacea/sage spray compared to a chlorhexidine/lidocaine-spray in the treatment of acute sore throat during five days of treatment.
Main outcome parameter is the non-inferiority in number of responders between the two treatment groups. A responder is defined as a reduction by 50% of the total baseline score taken prior to treatment start. The symptoms are assessed with a symptom score.
- Detailed Description
Further secondary parameters are :
Responders during at day 4 and 5, single symptom scores during 1 to 5 days of observation, pain at begin and end (100mm VAS), assessment of efficacy by physician and patient, consumption of rescue medication
Assessment of safety by physician and patient, frequency of adverse events
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 154
- Age > 12 years;
- Acute pharyngitis or tonsillitis with symptoms of throat pain and inflammation of the pharynx and/or tonsils;
- Onset of sore throat less than 72 hours before inclusion ;
- A Tonsillopharyngitis Severity Score ≥6;
- Written informed consent.
- Analgesics <12 hours;
- Antibiotics <24 hours; t
- Topical throat pain medication <4 hours;
- Systemic corticosteroids within the last month;
- Symptoms of primary bacterial pharyngitis or secondary bacterial infection;
- Serious illness such as tumors; allergy to one of the ingredients; pregnancy or lactation;
- Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen;
- Participation in another clinical trial in the previous 30 days.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 echinacea/sage Drug: Echinacea/sage patients received additionally a placebo-spray for the synthetical comparator (chlorhexidine/lidocaine) as the study was double dummy blinded. Patients had to apply spray every 2 hours with two puffs to the pharyngeal area up to a maximum of 10 times daily. Treatment duration was until illness was resolved or for a maximum of 5 consecutive days. Arms: 1 1 chlorhexidine/lidocaine Drug: Chlorhexidine/lidocaine patients received additionally a placebo-spray for the synthetical comparator (echinacea/sage) as the study was double dummy blinded. Patients had to apply spray every 2 hours with two puffs to the pharyngeal area up to a maximum of 10 times daily. Treatment duration was until illness was resolved or for a maximum of 5 consecutive days.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method comparison of responder of the two treatment groups after the first, second, and third days. A responder is defined as a reduction by 50% of the total baseline score taken prior to treatment start. first three days of treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of response rates after 4th and 5th days of treatment; VAS throat pain; amount rescue medication used; global assessment efficacy Frequency of adverse events, global assessment of tolerability five days of treatment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Allergy Clinic
🇨🇭Landquart, Switzerland