跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06049251
NCT06049251已完成不适用

Effects of ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises on Pain, Function and Mobility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Riphah International University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2023年9月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Oswestry Disability Index

研究概览

简要总结

Study will be a Randomized clinical trial to check the effects of ELDOA technique versus lumbar SNAGS with motor control exercises on pain, function and mobility in patients with chronic low back pain. Duration of study will be 8 months, non probability convenience sampling technique will be used, subject following eligibility criteria from District Headquarters Hospital Okara will be randomly allocated in two groups using computer random number generator. baseline assessment will be done. Group A participants will be given baseline treatment along with ELDOA exercises, Group B participants will be given baseline treatment along with Lumbar SNAGS and motor control exercises for 3 weeks. Assessment will be done by using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Inclinometer at baseline, at 3 weeks and a follow up will be taken at 6 weeks. 3 sessions per week will be given, data will be analyzed by using SPSS version 21.

详细描述

LBP is a significant global health problem, and its impact is still great. In 2019, there were 6972.5 (95% UI 6190.5 to 7860.5) age-standardized point prevalence estimates for LBP worldwide, with 568.4 million (95% UI 505.0 to 640.6 million) prevalent cases. The GBD research also revealed that LBP has a worldwide point prevalence of 9.4%, with men having a greater prevalence than women (8.7% vs. 10.1%). Back discomfort might arise as a result of mobility disorders, musculoskeletal sprains, incorrect spine positioning, or nucleus pulposus degeneration. There is huge literature regarding the management of low back pain and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in treatment options. The current study will compare the ELDOA technique to Lumbar SNAGS with motor control exercises. The current study is novel in a way that there is very limited evidence avialbale on ELDOA Technique and Motor Control Exercises. This study will provide vital insights into their efficacy and can help to guide clinical decision making for individuals with low back pain. Furthermore, this study can add to the expanding body of information regarding low back pain treatment and will help to improve patient outcomes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-30
  • Patients of both genders.
  • Patients having chronic Low Back Pain ( >3 months duration)
  • Patients with restricted range of motion (patients will be examined for active lumbar range of motion)
  • Patients with lumbar straightening based on referral from orthopedic

排除标准

  • History of neurological condition of hip and lumbar region.
  • Medical red flag history (tumor, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis or Infection)
  • Medical record of severe disabling chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary disease.
  • Prescribed history of epidural steroidal injection for pain.

结局指标

主要结局

Oswestry Disability Index

时间窗: 3rd Week

Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. Test-retest reliability has been shown to be high, a study by Fairbank et al recorded values ranging from = 0.83 to 0.99 that can vary over a given period of time. Each item consists of 6 statements. With Each item is scored on a 0---5 scale, and the maximum score is 50.

Numeric Pain Rating Scale

时间窗: 3rd Week

The 11-point NPRS (intervals from 0-10) is used to quantify pain intensity; 0 represents no pain, and 10 represent the worst possible agony

Inclinometer

时间窗: 3rd Week

Lumbar spine mobility will be assessed by inclinometer. It consists of a circular, fluid- filled disk with a bubble that indicates the number of degrees on the scale of protractor.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验