Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06049251
NCT06049251CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises on Pain, Function and Mobility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Riphah International University1 site in 1 country32 target enrollmentStarted: September 25, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
32
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Inclinometer

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Study will be a Randomized clinical trial to check the effects of ELDOA technique versus lumbar SNAGS with motor control exercises on pain, function and mobility in patients with chronic low back pain. Duration of study will be 8 months, non probability convenience sampling technique will be used, subject following eligibility criteria from District Headquarters Hospital Okara will be randomly allocated in two groups using computer random number generator. baseline assessment will be done. Group A participants will be given baseline treatment along with ELDOA exercises, Group B participants will be given baseline treatment along with Lumbar SNAGS and motor control exercises for 3 weeks. Assessment will be done by using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Inclinometer at baseline, at 3 weeks and a follow up will be taken at 6 weeks. 3 sessions per week will be given, data will be analyzed by using SPSS version 21.

Detailed Description

LBP is a significant global health problem, and its impact is still great. In 2019, there were 6972.5 (95% UI 6190.5 to 7860.5) age-standardized point prevalence estimates for LBP worldwide, with 568.4 million (95% UI 505.0 to 640.6 million) prevalent cases. The GBD research also revealed that LBP has a worldwide point prevalence of 9.4%, with men having a greater prevalence than women (8.7% vs. 10.1%). Back discomfort might arise as a result of mobility disorders, musculoskeletal sprains, incorrect spine positioning, or nucleus pulposus degeneration. There is huge literature regarding the management of low back pain and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in treatment options. The current study will compare the ELDOA technique to Lumbar SNAGS with motor control exercises. The current study is novel in a way that there is very limited evidence avialbale on ELDOA Technique and Motor Control Exercises. This study will provide vital insights into their efficacy and can help to guide clinical decision making for individuals with low back pain. Furthermore, this study can add to the expanding body of information regarding low back pain treatment and will help to improve patient outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 30 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age 18-30
  • •Patients of both genders.
  • •Patients having chronic Low Back Pain ( >3 months duration)
  • •Patients with restricted range of motion (patients will be examined for active lumbar range of motion)
  • •Patients with lumbar straightening based on referral from orthopedic

Exclusion Criteria

  • •History of neurological condition of hip and lumbar region.
  • •Medical red flag history (tumor, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis or Infection)
  • •Medical record of severe disabling chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary disease.
  • •Prescribed history of epidural steroidal injection for pain.

Arms & Interventions

ELDOA exercises

Experimental

ELDOA exercises

Intervention: ELDOA exercises (Other)

Lumbar SNAGS and motor control exercises

Active Comparator

Lumbar SNAGS and motor control exercises

Intervention: Lumbar SNAGS and motor control exercises (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Inclinometer

Time Frame: 3rd Week

Lumbar spine mobility will be assessed by inclinometer. It consists of a circular, fluid- filled disk with a bubble that indicates the number of degrees on the scale of protractor.

Oswestry Disability Index

Time Frame: 3rd Week

Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. Test-retest reliability has been shown to be high, a study by Fairbank et al recorded values ranging from = 0.83 to 0.99 that can vary over a given period of time. Each item consists of 6 statements. With Each item is scored on a 0---5 scale, and the maximum score is 50.

Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Time Frame: 3rd Week

The 11-point NPRS (intervals from 0-10) is used to quantify pain intensity; 0 represents no pain, and 10 represent the worst possible agony

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials