MedPath

Caffeine Mouth Rinsing at Different Doses in Female Team-Sport Athletes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dietary Supplement
Sports Performance
Registration Number
NCT07129863
Lead Sponsor
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Brief Summary

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of different caffeine mouth rinse concentrations (1%, 2%, and 3%) on Running Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) performance in female team-sport athletes.

Main Questions:

1. Do caffeine mouth rinses improve RAST performance in female team-sport athletes?

2. Do different caffeine mouth rinse concentrations affect ratings of perceived exertion (RPE)?

Method:

Thirteen trained female football and handball players (23.0 ± 4.5 years) completed four randomized, double-blind, crossover conditions (1%, 2%, and 3% caffeine mouth rinses, and placebo). Each trial involved six 35 m sprints separated by 10 s of rest. RPE was recorded immediately after each session.

Detailed Description

Objective:

To evaluate the acute effects of different caffeine mouth rinse concentrations (1%, 2%, and 3%) on anaerobic sprint performance and perceived exertion in trained female team-sport athletes. The study sought to determine whether this non-ingestive ergogenic strategy could enhance high-intensity running performance and reduce effort perception.

Main Questions:

1. Do different caffeine mouth rinse concentrations improve Running Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) performance in trained female team-sport athletes?

2. Do caffeine mouth rinses at varying concentrations influence ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) compared with placebo?

Is there an optimal caffeine concentration that balances potential performance benefits with reduced perceived exertion?

Method:

Thirteen trained female athletes (mean age 23.0 ± 4.5 years) competing in football and handball participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Each athlete completed four experimental conditions: placebo, 1% caffeine mouth rinse, 2% caffeine mouth rinse, and 3% caffeine mouth rinse. In each session, participants performed a Running Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) consisting of six maximal 35 m sprints separated by 10 seconds of passive recovery. The RPE was assessed immediately after each test using a 1-10 scale.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
13
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST protocol)2-week

The RAST was comprised of six 35 m sprints at maximum effort, each of which was followed by a 10 s passive rest period (including deceleration phase). Participants rinsed the solution in the final 5 s of the rest period accompanied by the counting of the tester, and then sprint back to the first timing gate with "GO" command. This was repeated until six sprints had been accomplished. Participants began to sprint running for a maximum of one step before the timing gate and were instructed not to decelerate before passing through the timing gate. Using a system of photocells (Newtest Powertimer 300-series, Newtest Oy, Tyrnävä, Finland), which was placed at the beginning and the end of the 35 m, the duration of each 35 m sprint running time was recorded. Using time of each sprint attempt, 1-) fastest sprint time, 2-) mean sprint time, and 3-) fatigue index were recorded

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE)2-weeks

Perceived exertion during each trial was assessed immediately after the Running Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) using a 1-10 numerical scale points, where:

1 = Very, very light effort (minimal exertion, easy to continue)

2-3 = Light effort (comfortable, mild strain)

4-5 = Moderate effort (noticeable breathing and muscle activation)

6-7 = Hard effort (challenging but sustainable for a short time)

8-9 = Very hard effort (significant discomfort, near maximal effort)

10 = Maximal effort (unable to continue beyond current level, exhaustion)

This scale provided a subjective measure of the athletes' internal load, complementing the objective performance metrics from the sprint test.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Eastern Mediterranean University

🇹🇷

Mersin, Sbf C 116, Turkey

Eastern Mediterranean University
🇹🇷Mersin, Sbf C 116, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.