Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04082624
NCT04082624CompletedNot Applicable

Workplace Wellness: Improving Your Experience at Work

University of Victoria1 site in 1 country116 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
116
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Sitting time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The primary objective of study was to compare affective (i.e., highlighted emotional benefits), instrumental (i.e., highlighted other health benefits), and self-regulation (i.e., demonstrated ways to plan, set goals, etc.) interventions in terms of their ability to motivate less sitting in the workplace. Research of this type is important because people sit for long periods of time at work which adversely affects their health and productivity.

It was hypothesized that the affective and self-regulation groups would sit less than the instrumental and control groups based on evidence indicating that affective attitude (i.e., emotional evaluation of the behavior) and self-regulation techniques tend to predict behavior.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •From a local workplace in Victoria
  • •Full-time employee (i.e., greater than 35 hours per week)
  • •Reported over 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • •Agreed to attend the 3 intervention sessions

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Not from a local workplace in Victoria
  • •Not a full-time employee (i.e., 35 hours or less per week)
  • •Reported less than 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • •Did not agree to attend the 3 intervention sessions

Arms & Interventions

Affective condition

Experimental

Learned about the affective benefits (e.g., less depression) of reduced office sitting time through taking active breaks. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

Intervention: Affective condition (Behavioral)

Nutrition condition

Active Comparator

Received nutrition information such as the comparison of nutritional information between orange juice and soda pop. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

Intervention: Nutrition condition (Behavioral)

Instrumental condition

Experimental

Learned about instrumental benefits such as the relationship between sitting and cardiovascular disease and absenteeism at work. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

Intervention: Instrumental condition (Behavioral)

Self-regulation condition

Experimental

Learned how to self-monitor their sedentary behavior and active breaks. They also learned how to create prompts/cues (e.g., sticky note reminder), problem solve to overcome barriers, action plan (i.e., specifying when, where, and how to do the behavior), and set goals in order to be less sedentary according to SMART (i.e., specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-oriented) principles. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

Intervention: Self-regulation condition (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Sitting time

Time Frame: Twelve weeks post-baseline

Average hours of sitting time per day at work

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ryan Rhodes

Primary investigator

University of Victoria

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials