MedPath

Workplace Wellness: Improving Your Experience at Work

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obesity
Sedentary Behavior
Interventions
Behavioral: Nutrition condition
Behavioral: Self-regulation condition
Behavioral: Affective condition
Behavioral: Instrumental condition
Registration Number
NCT04082624
Lead Sponsor
University of Victoria
Brief Summary

The primary objective of study was to compare affective (i.e., highlighted emotional benefits), instrumental (i.e., highlighted other health benefits), and self-regulation (i.e., demonstrated ways to plan, set goals, etc.) interventions in terms of their ability to motivate less sitting in the workplace. Research of this type is important because people sit for long periods of time at work which adversely affects their health and productivity.

It was hypothesized that the affective and self-regulation groups would sit less than the instrumental and control groups based on evidence indicating that affective attitude (i.e., emotional evaluation of the behavior) and self-regulation techniques tend to predict behavior.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
116
Inclusion Criteria
  • From a local workplace in Victoria
  • Full-time employee (i.e., greater than 35 hours per week)
  • Reported over 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • Agreed to attend the 3 intervention sessions
Exclusion Criteria
  • Not from a local workplace in Victoria
  • Not a full-time employee (i.e., 35 hours or less per week)
  • Reported less than 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • Did not agree to attend the 3 intervention sessions

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Nutrition conditionNutrition conditionReceived nutrition information such as the comparison of nutritional information between orange juice and soda pop. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.
Self-regulation conditionSelf-regulation conditionLearned how to self-monitor their sedentary behavior and active breaks. They also learned how to create prompts/cues (e.g., sticky note reminder), problem solve to overcome barriers, action plan (i.e., specifying when, where, and how to do the behavior), and set goals in order to be less sedentary according to SMART (i.e., specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-oriented) principles. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.
Affective conditionAffective conditionLearned about the affective benefits (e.g., less depression) of reduced office sitting time through taking active breaks. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.
Instrumental conditionInstrumental conditionLearned about instrumental benefits such as the relationship between sitting and cardiovascular disease and absenteeism at work. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sitting timeTwelve weeks post-baseline

Average hours of sitting time per day at work

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Behavioural Medicine Laboratory

🇨🇦

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath