MedPath

Lumbar Stabilization, Strengthening and Stretching in Chronic Low Back Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Low Back Pain
Interventions
Other: Stabilization , strengthening and stretching
Registration Number
NCT01124201
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three exercise programs in patients with chronic low back pain: Segmental stabilization, superficial strengthening and stretching. Groups were contrasted regarding pain, functional disability and TrA muscle activation capacity. The three groups of exercise improved pain and functional disabilities, and the Segmental stabilization group was better in the ability to recruit TrA muscle.

Detailed Description

Objective: To contrast the efficacy of three exercise programs, segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscle and lumbar stretching on pain, functional impairment, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Design: Forty-five patients were randomized into three groups namely: Segmental stabilization group (ES)(transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus) (n=15, mean age 42,02 ± 8,15), superficial strengthening group (FS)(rectus abdominis, oblique abdominal muscles and erector spinae muscles) (n=15, mean age 41,71±6,41) and stretching group (AL) (erector spinae, posterior connective tissues and ischiotibials muscles) (n=15 mean age 41,53 ± 4,41). Groups were contrasted regarding pain (visual analogical scale and McGill pain questionnaire), functional disability (Oswestry disability questionnaire) and TrA muscle activation capacity (Pressure Biofeedback Unit = PBU). The program lasted 6 weeks, and sessions happened twice a week, with duration of 30 minutes each. Analysis of variance was used for inter and intragroup comparisons. Significance level was established at 5%.

Patients attended two weekly sessions during six weeks and were evaluated for pain (visual analogue scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire), functional disability (Oswestry disability index), and ability to contract the TrA (Pressure biofeedback unit) before and after the treatment. The treatment program consisted of 30 minutes sessions. The Anova one-way and Tukey´s Post Hoc were used to compare groups. The significance level adopted was 5%.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • low back pain for more than 3 months
  • patients willing to participate and could participate in an exercise program safely and without cognitive impairments that would limit their participation.
Exclusion Criteria
  • past history of back surgery
  • rheumatologic disorders
  • spine infections
  • spine exercise training in the 3 months before study onset.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stabilization groupStabilization , strengthening and stretchingIn the Segmental Stabilization group exercises focused on the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles.
Strengthening groupStabilization , strengthening and stretchingIn the Superficial Strengthening group, exercises focused on the rectus abdominis, abdominus obliquus internus, abdominus obliquus externus and erector spinae muscles.
Stretching groupStabilization , strengthening and stretchingStretching group: erector spinae, posterior connective tissues and ischiotibials muscles
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
TrA muscle activation capacity (Pressure Biofeedback Unit = PBU)Six weeks
Pain (visual analogical scale and McGill pain questionnaire)Six weeks
Functional disability (Oswestry disability questionnaire)Six weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

🇧🇷

Sao Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath