Comparing Clinical Benefits of Gamma Knife and Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
- Interventions
- Radiation: Gamma knife
- Registration Number
- NCT03991039
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Baghdad
- Brief Summary
Clinical randomized study to compare the clinical effectiveness between two modalities of treatment of trigeminal neuralgia namely gamma knife radio surgery and microvascular decompression
- Detailed Description
A randomized prospective study conducted in The Neurosciences Hospital, Baghdad, from January 2016 to January 2018, patients had either GKR treatment or treated with MVD. The pain evaluated pre- and post-operatively using the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity scale (BNIPI), visual analog scale (VAS) and Brief Pain Inventory Facial (BPI-Facial) scoring systems. In GKR procedure, the trigeminal root entry zone targeted with a radiation dose of 80 Gy. MVD was performed using retro-sigmoid approach. Follow-up period for two years
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 84
- primary idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia
- secondary trigeminal neuralgia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description MVD Group Gamma knife Patients treated with microvascular decompression Gamma knife group Gamma knife Patients selected to be treated with gamma knife radiosurgery
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity scale (1-5) Two years The pain evaluated pre- and post-operatively with the use of analgesic drugs the best is 1 indicates free of pain, the worst is 5. It is dependent score
visual analog scale (0-10) Two years Pain severity described subjectively by the patient himself pre and post treatment , the 0 is free of pain and worst is 10. It is dependent score
Brief Pain Inventory (1-7) ُTwo years Assess pain severity as impact to functional activities, the 7 is normal live activity and the worst is 1. It is dependent score
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method