跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07217366
NCT07217366Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Testing a Speech-to-text Tool for Heart Failure Patient-Reported Data

Stanford University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2025年10月13日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Accuracy of AI Voice Assistant Compared With Expert Extraction

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to see whether this type of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Voice Assistant can reliably capture patient-reported health information to support communication between patients and their healthcare team.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Adults with heart failure receiving cardiology care at Stanford University

排除标准

  • •Diminished decision-making capacity
  • •Inability to understand and communicate in English sufficiently to complete study procedures
  • •Inability to complete study procedures to the best of the participant's and investigator's knowledge
  • •Any disorder or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion

研究组 & 干预措施

AI Voice Assistant

Experimental

Participants in the AI Voice Assistant arm will complete two activities: (1) an interaction with the AI Voice Assistant tool and (2) Paper survey that includes the same questions asked by AI voice assistant. Half of the participants will use the AI Voice Assistant first, while the other half will begin with the paper survey.

干预措施: Artificial intelligence speech-to-text tool (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Accuracy of AI Voice Assistant Compared With Expert Extraction

时间窗: ~3 months

Agreement between AI-generated summaries and expert-reviewed responses (study staff extraction of participants' responses from audio recordings). The responses will be scored on a numerical scale, ranging from 0-17 points with higher points representing greater accuracy of the AI-generated summaries compared to expert-reviewed responses.

次要结局

  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scores(~3 months)
  • Usability of AI Voice Assistant(~3 months)
  • Agreement between AI Voice Assistant Compared With Patient Self-Reported Written Responses(~3 months)
  • Qualitative Feedback(~3 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alexander Sandhu

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Stanford University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验