Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07230886
NCT07230886RecruitingNot Applicable

Prospective Reduction Of Transplant Complications Through Enhanced Preservation Therapy to Prevent Primary Graft Dysfunction

University Health Network, Toronto1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: April 17, 2026Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #1

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility of the study protocol comparing a novel temperature control system - Xo Port Organ Preservation System - to static ice for heat preservation for Heart Transplant. The main questions of the study are as follows:

Does the Incidence of severe PGD change within the first 24 hours of heart transplant in patients randomized to the Xo Port Organ Preservation System?

Was there a change in composite efficacy endpoints in participants randomized to the Xo Port Organ Preservation System compared to static ice storage?

Were the feasibility outcomes achieved?

Were there any protocol deviations?

Participants will:

Be randomized to either the Xo Port Organ Preservation System or static ice storage.

Complete a questionnaire at the time of screening, day 0, 7, and 90 days post transplant.

Have blood drawn - with their standard of care blood draws - after their transplant, the day after, and 7 days post transplant.

Detailed Description

The PROTECT-PGD Pilot trial is a 2.5 year, 50-patient, multi-centre, feasibility, randomized, blinded, controlled pilot trial assessing feasibility of a full-scale blinded randomized controlled trial to determine whether use of the Xo Port Organ Preservation System (Traferox Technologies Inc.), a novel temperature controlled system that maintains donor heart temperature between 8 and 12°C reduces the risk of severe PGD in patients post HT. If feasibility is demonstrated, pilot trial participants will be included in the full-scale trial.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

Masking Description

The participant and all study personnel will be blinded to the treatment arm the participant is randomized to - with exception to the unblinded research assistant that will be performing the randomization and allocation process.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
17 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Recipient: Adult (>17 years old)
  • •Donor: Donation after brain death acceptable for transplant as determined by a procuring physician unaware of randomization sequence at the time of acceptance

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Recipient: Multi-organ transplant recipients; Participating in an interventional study.
  • •Donor: Donation after cardiac death; Use of organ care system

Arms & Interventions

Xo Port Organ Preservation System

Experimental

Traferox Transport System containing eutectic gel-packs used for controlled hypothermic storage

Intervention: Xo Port Organ Preservation System (Device)

Static Ice Storage

Active Comparator

Traferox Transport System containing ice-packs as used for conventional cold static storage

Intervention: Standard of Care - Ice packs (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #1

Time Frame: 2.5 years

90-day mortality

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #2

Time Frame: 2.5 years

severe PGD (defined through the ISHLT consensus definition need for MCS will be adjudicated in a blinded fashion with LVEF\<40% and CI\<2.0 on high dose inotropes

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #3

Time Frame: 2.5 years

duration of mechanical ventilation

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #4

Time Frame: 2.5 years

ICU length of stay (LOS)

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #5

Time Frame: 2.5 years

index transplant LOS

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #6

Time Frame: 2.5 years

Moderate to severe rejection based on ISHLT criteria at 90 days

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #7

Time Frame: 2.5 years

change in EQ-5D-5L utility index score from baseline to 90 days with a clinically meaningful change defined as \>0.05

Composite efficacy outcome of full-scare trial #8

Time Frame: 2.5 years

cfDNA count measured over POD0, POD1, and POD7

Primary Study Feasibility

Time Frame: 2.5 years

Determined by the mean number of participants recruited per month calculated on recruitment over 24 months.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials