MedPath

The Comparative Study of Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior Discectomy and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
M-JOA Score
Interventions
Procedure: Percutaneous Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy
Procedure: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion
Registration Number
NCT04175535
Lead Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Brief Summary

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is the standard procedure for operation of cervical disc herniations. Mobility-preserving Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior discectomy is the most common alternative in the case of soft localization of the pathology. Endoscopic techniques are considered standard in many areas, since they may offer advantages in surgical technique and rehabilitation. These days, all disc herniations can be operated in full-endoscopic technique. With the full-endoscopic posterior cervical discectomy a procedures is available for cervical disc operations.

Detailed Description

Investigators conducted a differential, randomized, 1:1, double-blind clinical control trial to compare the clinical effect, safety and feasibility of Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior discectomy and Anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The study was conducted in three centers at the same time, including the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital and Ningbo University Medical College Affiliated Hospital. This study is expected to include 308 patients with single level soft cervical disc herniation.Participants were randomly assigned to different groups for corresponding surgical intervention after complete preoperative evaluation.Participants received a standard 5-year follow-up procedure

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
308
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Single cervical intervertebral dis herniation wih symptoms of radicular pain or spinal cord compression ; 2) the herniated lesions had no obvious calcification; 3) conservative treatment fails ; 4) mild myelopathy (Nurick grade 3 or blow. (6) patients agree to participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. cervical segmental instability or deformity (cervical spondylolisthesis or Cobb Angle greater than 25°); 2) multisegmental lesions (≥2); 3) tumor, infection or other unknown space occupying in cervical vertebra; 4) surgical history of the target segment; 5) severe myelopathy (Nurick grade 4 or above); 6) the patients were not suitable for surgery, had poor medical management or did not agree to participate in this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
The experimental groupPercutaneous Posterior Endoscopic Cervical DiscectomyPPECD was performed in the experimental group
control groupAnterior cervical decompression and fusionACDF was performed in the control group
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Improvement rateFollow up for 5 years

M-JOA Scoring

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Basic information of participantsFollow up for 5 years

weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

Imaging examinationFollow up for 5 years

Cervical cobb angle change i

Pain AssessmentFollow up for 5 years

VAS Score

Operation durationintraoperative

Operation duration in minute

Amount of bleeding during operationFollow up for 5 years

Amount of bleeding during operation in milliliter

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

🇨🇳

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath