Intensive Symptom Surveillance Guided by Machine Learning-Directed Risk Stratification (INSIGHT)
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Sponsor
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute
- Enrollment
- 72
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Time to first acute care visit
- Status
- Active, Not Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This clinical trial compares intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care to standard symptom management in patients with head and neck cancer that has not spread to other places in the body (non-metastatic). Standard symptom management involves symptom management during and after radiation therapy, using problem-focused history and physical examination followed by appropriate symptomatic management as appropriate per treating physician's discretion. Intensive symptom management with monitoring patient reported outcomes is performed among patients with metastatic cancers receiving systemic therapies and with various cancers receiving radiation therapy. This trial may help researchers determine the impact of intensive symptom surveillance in patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancers.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management on time to first acute care visits at 3 months. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management on (1) changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), financial burden, and caregiver burden from baseline, (2) time to first acute care visits at 1 or 6 month, (3) locoregional (LRF) and distant failure (DF), and (4) progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. II. Using study questionnaires to determine the impact of intensive symptom evaluation with supportive care as needed per treating physician's discretion versus standard symptom management when stratified. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP A: Patients complete a quality of life questionnaires over 10-15 minutes twice weekly (BIW) during standard of care radiation therapy and once weekly (QW) for the first month after completing standard of care radiation therapy course, and then once monthly for 6 months. GROUP B: Patients receive standard symptom management QW during standard of care radiation therapy for 6 months after completing radiation therapy course.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •PATIENTS: Age \>= 18 years of age
- •PATIENTS: Diagnosed with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
- •PATIENTS: Scheduled to start curative-intent radiation therapy within 4 weeks
- •PATIENTS: Able to provide informed consent in English
- •PATIENTS: Able to read and write in English
- •PATIENTS: Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related assessment
- •PATIENTS' INFORMED CAREGIVER (e.g. family members, friends): They are verbally identified by eligible patients as a caregiver
- •PATIENTS' INFORMED CAREGIVER (e.g. family members, friends): They are not receiving any payment to provide care for patients
- •PATIENTS' INFORMED CAREGIVER (e.g. family members, friends): Able to provide informed consent in English
- •PATIENTS' INFORMED CAREGIVER (e.g. family members, friends): Able to read and write in English
Exclusion Criteria
- •PATIENTS: Diagnosed with metastatic head and neck cancer
- •PATIENTS: Eligible for palliative-intent radiation therapy only
- •PATIENTS: Pregnant female participants
- •PATIENTS: Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
- •PATIENTS: Any condition which in the Investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate
Arms & Interventions
Group A (quality of life questionnaire)
Patients complete a quality of life questionnaires over 10-15 minutes BIW during standard of care radiation therapy and QW for the first month after completing standard of care radiation therapy course, and then once monthly for 6 months.
Intervention: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Group A (quality of life questionnaire)
Patients complete a quality of life questionnaires over 10-15 minutes BIW during standard of care radiation therapy and QW for the first month after completing standard of care radiation therapy course, and then once monthly for 6 months.
Intervention: Questionnaire Administration
Group B (standard symptom management)
Patients receive standard symptom management QW during standard of care radiation therapy and for 6 months after completing radiation therapy course.
Intervention: Palliative Therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time to first acute care visit
Time Frame: At 3 months
to evaluate the impact of intensive symptom evaluation compared to standard symptom management on time to first acute care visits at 3 months with time to first acute care visits.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Health-related quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30(Baseline to 6 months)
- Overall survival(Time interval from diagnosis to death from any cause, assessed up to 6 months)
- Change in financial burden(Baseline to 6 months)
- Locoregional failure(Time interval from diagnosis to locoregional failure, assessed up to 6 months)
- Change in caregiver burden(Baseline to 6 months)
- Time to first acute care visits(At 1 or 6 month)
- Distant failure(Time interval from diagnosis to distant failure outside head and neck region, assessed up to 6 months)
- Progression free survival(Time interval from diagnosis to tumor recurrence or progression of disease, assessed up to 6 months)