Comparison of two different types of treatment in Mandibular condyle fracture
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: S026- Fracture of mandible
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/01/017116
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Dentistry All India Institution of Medical Sciences Jodhpur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1. Patients in the age group between 16-65 years
2. Patient with unilateral or bilateral condylar fractures.
3. Good physical and mental condition (ASA I , II )
4. Absence of infection or trauma prior to the surgery.
1. Age <16 years and >65 years.
2. Patients/with life threatening cardio-respiratory co-morbidities increasing risk of complication during GA
like previous MI/under treatment for CAD,COPD patients, severe hepatic and renal impairment, patients
with head injury (condition that increased amount of pressure in brain).
3. Patient diagnosed with pan-facial fractures.
4. Pregnant patients.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anatomical Reduction of fracture at day 180 postoperativeTimepoint: Anatomical Reduction of fracture at day 180 postoperative
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduction under direct vision <br/ ><br>Time of plating (time from final reduction to last screw tightened) <br/ ><br>Fracture reduction assessment <br/ ><br>Occlusion <br/ ><br>Orthopantomogram <br/ ><br>Townes View <br/ ><br>Maximum mouth opening <br/ ><br>Maximum lateral excursive movement <br/ ><br>Electromyography <br/ ><br>Temporomandibular joint Dysfunction (TMD) <br/ ><br>Post operative Pain assessed through VAS score <br/ ><br>Swelling <br/ ><br>Plate Infection <br/ ><br>Plate fracture & Screw loosening <br/ ><br>Sialocele/Parotid Fistula <br/ ><br>Facial Nerve Injury.Timepoint: DAY 1 7 30 90 180