Comparison between two laryngoscopes in term neonates and babies upto 6 months of age
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/12/038787
- Lead Sponsor
- JIPMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
Full term Neonates and infants upto 6 months with ASA class I and II requiring general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation for any surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria
1)Patients with increased risk of gastric regurgitation and aspiration (which includes patients with anomalies like congenital diaphragmatic hernia and intestinal obstruction)
2) Patients with congenital airway anomalies
3) Patients with anticipated difficult airway (which includes patients with hydrocephalus and syndromes with features like micrognathia and retrognathia)
4) Active upper respiratory tract infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the time taken for successful tracheal intubation with Besdata video laryngoscope and Miller direct laryngoscope in term neonates and infants up to 6 months of ageTimepoint: Baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time for best glottic visualizationTimepoint: Baseline;To assess for development of complications such as airway mucosal trauma, bradycardia, esophageal intubation.Timepoint: NA;To compare first attempt intubation success rateTimepoint: NA;To compare POGO Score (Percentage of Glottic opening) between the two groupsTimepoint: NA