Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02066233
NCT02066233CompletedNot Applicable

Prospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of E.G.Scan to Detect Barrett's Esophagus Compared With Standard Endoscopy

Mayo Clinic1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Median Tolerability Score on 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a disposable nasal endoscope called "E.G. Scan II" will visualize the esophagus as well as the standard test, sedated endoscopy.

Detailed Description

All subjects underwent two procedures: the E.G.Scan II followed by standard endoscopy in a tandem design. The E.G. Scan II is a transnasal endoscope system to capture and transmit images of the esophagus. Captured images can be reviewed via the E.G. View for diagnosis of diseases related to the esophagus. Generally, the commercial esophagoscope system has reusable probes, but E.G. Scan™ II has a single use probe because reusable probes have the risk of infection and pollution.

Prior to the E.G.Scan, subjects received a standard prep for the procedure. The two procedures were performed by two different experienced endoscopists who were blinded to the indication of the procedure. At both procedures a note was made of any abnormality of the esophagus. Every subject with an endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus had clinical biopsies taken to confirm diagnosis. Subject tolerability was measured with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Adult participants aged 18 years or above who are scheduled for routine upper GI endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance, varices surveillance and dyspepsia.
  • •Able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients known to be intolerant to endoscopy.
  • •Patients with frequent epistaxis.
  • •Patients not clinically fit for endoscopy as judged by their care team.
  • •Pregnant women.
  • •Patients with allergy/sensitivity to Simethicone (Mylicon), Phenylephrine, Lidocaine nasal spray, Benzocaine spray (Topex)
  • •Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets.

Arms & Interventions

Subjects with Barrett's Esophagus

Active Comparator

All subjects will receive transnasal endoscopy (EG Scan II) followed by standard endoscopy.

Intervention: EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) (Device)

Subjects with Barrett's Esophagus

Active Comparator

All subjects will receive transnasal endoscopy (EG Scan II) followed by standard endoscopy.

Intervention: Standard Endoscopy (Procedure)

Subjects with Reflux and/or Heartburn

Active Comparator

All subjects will receive EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) followed by standard endoscopy.

Intervention: EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) (Device)

Subjects with Reflux and/or Heartburn

Active Comparator

All subjects will receive EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) followed by standard endoscopy.

Intervention: Standard Endoscopy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Median Tolerability Score on 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Time Frame: Within 48 hours

On the 10-point VAS, 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

Secondary Outcomes

  • Preference for Either of the Two Procedures, EG II Scan Versus Standard Endoscopy(Two weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prasad G. Iyer

Associate Professor of Medicine

Mayo Clinic

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials