Comparison between two methods of caries prevention using two resin-based materials: sealant or infiltrant
- Conditions
- Dental caries, Preventive Dentistry, Child, Adolescent and Young Adult.C07.793.720.210E06.761M01.060.406M01.060.057M01.060.116.815
- Registration Number
- RBR-49zkm6
- Lead Sponsor
- niversidade Anhanguera de São Paulo - UNIAN-SP
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Health volunteers; both genders; aging between 8 and 24 years; molars with intact deep and retentive occlusal fissures to visual inspection; teeth in contact with the antagonist tooth; teeth presenting visual non-cavitated caries lesions located between the enamel and dentin junction and middle one-third of dentin.
Restorations and white spot lesions or cavitations on other tooth surfaces; teeth reported as sensitive to any type of stimulus; physically and mentally challenged volunteers; volunteers with systemic diseases under medication; children with poor oral habits affecting occlusion.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduction of the caries progression, reducing the prevalence of dental caries in children and young people by applying a resin infiltrant as alternative to pit and fissure sealants in comparison to a conventional pit-and-fissure sealant applied in the contralateral teeth, analyzed by means of caries detection using laser fluorescence method, caries detection using radiographic analysis, and sealant marginal integrity, clinically validating its effectiveness by comparing the results after immediate application (baseline), and after 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years of the application.;Reduction of the caries progression by means of the qualitative analyses performed in order to complement the results by means of digital photographs and morphological analysis of the occlusal surfaces of teeth that received the application of both sealing materials using scanning electron microscope, performed according to the different evaluation times: baseline (immediately after application), after 1, 2, and 3 years.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secundary outcomes are not expected.