Negative Oral Contrast Agents Utilization in PET/CT Studies
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Enrollment
- 150
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- compare the performance of different negative oral contrast agents in PET/Ct studies
Study Overview
Brief Summary
To compare the performance of different negative oral contrast agents in bowel distension in patient referred for PET/CT studies for various causes aiming for identification of ideal oral contrast agent(OCA).
Detailed Description
Evaluation of gastrointestinal pathology depends on adequate bowel distention, which optimizes resolution of the bowel wall and contents. Traditionally, high-attenuation oral Contrast material in the form of iodine solutions or barium suspensions has been used to obtain bowel distension in MDCT examinations
Traditional high-contrast oral agents like iodine solutions, and barium suspensions which due to overcorrection problems in PET-CT interpretation lowers the accuracy of diagnosis. Negative oral contrast agents like water, air, fat containing agents used with 12.5% corn oil and polyethylene glycol has been used in radiological studies. Milk with 4% fat content has also been tested out in radiological studies and found to be effective. As it is more easily available, palatable, and acceptable especially, by children it needed to be tested in the visualization of the GIT in the PET-CT studies compared to other negative contrast agents.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Cohort
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •all patients referred to our unit for PET/CT study for various causes
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with GIT disease.
- •Pregnancy and lactation.
- •Severely ill patients.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
compare the performance of different negative oral contrast agents in PET/Ct studies
Time Frame: baseline
comparing the effect of different oral contrast on bowel distention
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Nahla Mostafa Mahmoud Bashank
PhD
Assiut University