MedPath

Radiotherapy of Motor Deficits From Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
Interventions
Radiation: radiotherapy
Registration Number
NCT02189473
Lead Sponsor
Prof. Dirk Rades, MD
Brief Summary

The primary aim of this randomized multi-center trial is to investigate the efficacy of the radiotherapy regimens 5 x 4 Gy and 10 x 3 Gy with respect to the effect on motor function in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this randomized multi-center trial is to investigate the efficacy of the radiotherapy regimens 5 x 4 Gy and 10 x 3 Gy with respect to the effect on motor function in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. The response rate (improvement in motor function or prevention of progression) will be assessed at one month following radiotherapy.

In addition, the following endpoints will be evaluated:

1. Motor function; additional assessments directly and at 3 and at 6 months after radiotherapy

2. Ability to walk; assessment directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy

3. Sensory function; assessment directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy

4. Quality of life; evaluation directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy

5. Pain assessment directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy

6. Overall survival up to 6 months following radiotherapy

7. Local Progression-free survival up to 6 months following radiotherapy

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
203
Inclusion Criteria
  • Motor deficits of the lower extremities resulting from metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, which have persisted for no longer than 30 days
  • Confirmation of diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging (spinal computed tomography allowed)
  • Relatively poor survival prognosis (defined as ≤35 points on the survival score published in Cancer 2008)
  • Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior radiotherapy or surgery of the spinal areas affected by MESCC
  • History of symptomatic brain tumor or symptomatic brain metastases
  • Metastases of the cervical spine only
  • Other severe neurological disorders
  • Pregnancy, Lactation
  • Indication for decompressive surgery + stabilization of the affected spinal areas

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
5 x 4 Gy in 1 weekradiotherapyradiotherapy with 5 x 4 Gy in 1 week (5 x 4 Gy per week)
10 x 3 Gy in 2 weeksradiotherapyradiotherapy with 10 x 3 Gy in 2 weeks (5 x 3 Gy per week)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Showing Improvement or no Further Progression of Motor Deficits at 1 Month Following Radiotherapyat 1 month following radiotherapy

Overall response was defined as improvement or no further progression of motor deficits following radiotherapy.

Motor function was graded with the following 8-point scale: 0, complete paraplegia; 1, palpable or visible muscle contractions; 2, active movement of the leg without gravity; 3, active movement against gravity; 4, active movement against mild resistance; 5, active movement against intermediate resistance; 6, active movement against strong resistance; and 7, normal strength.

Motor function was recorded separately for each leg resulting in total points of 0 to 14. Improvement of motor function was defined as an increase by at least 2 points compared to baseline. No further progression was defined as +/-1 point (i.e. +1 point, +/- 0 points or -1 point).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Who Were Alive at 6 Months Following Radiotherapy Without Deterioration of Motor Function During (or Directly Following) Radiotherapy and Freedom From In-field Recurrence of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Following Radiotherapy6 months following radiotherapy

Local Progression Free Survival (LPFS) was defined as freedom from progression of motor deficits during or one month following radiotherapy and freedom from in-field recurrence of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) following radiotherapy.

An in-field recurrence was defined as a recurrence of MSCC associated with motor deficits in the region of the spinal cord that had been previously irradiated for MSCC.

In case of clinical suspicion of sich a recurrence, a spinal MRI was performed to confirm the diagnosis. Time to in-field recurrence was calculated from the last day of radiotherapy, and the patients were followed for a maximum of 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. The values of 6-month LPFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Number of Participants Who Experienced Relief of Distress at 1 Month Following Radiotherapy Compared to Baselineat 1 month following radiotherapy

Distress (as an indicator of impairment of quality of life) was measured with the distress-thermometer. the patients rated their level of distress on a scale ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Patients rated the distress they experienced during the last week and stated the reasons for distress from a list of items.

An improvement (lower score) by 2 points was considered a clinically relevant relief of distress. Patients with baseline-scores of 0-1 points were not included, since improvement by 2 points was not possible.

Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk at 1 Month Following Radiotherapyat 1 month following radiotherapy

Ambulatory status was assessed using the following scoring system:

0 = Normal strength

1. = Ambulatory without aid

2. = Ambulatory with aid

3. = Not ambulatory

A patient with a score equal to or less than 2 is considered "able to walk". Both participants that could and could not walk prior to radiotherapy have been included in this assessment..

Number of Participants Showing Improvement of Motor Deficits at 1 Month Following Radiotherapyat 1 month following radiotherapy

Motor function was graded with the following 8-point scale: 0, complete paraplegia; 1, palpable or visible muscle contractions; 2, active movement of the leg without gravity; 3, active movement against gravity; 4, active movement against mild resistance; 5, active movement against intermediate resistance; 6, active movement against strong resistance; and 7, normal strength.

Motor function was recorded separately for each leg resulting in total points of 0 to 14. Improvement of motor function was defined as an increase by at least 2 points compared to baseline.

Number of Participants Who Experienced Relief of Pain at 1 Month Following Radiotherapy Compared to Baselineat 1 month following radiotherapy

Pain was measured with a numeric self-rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Relief of pain was defined as improvement (=decrease of pain) by at least 2 points without increase of analgesics. Patients with baseline-scores of 0-1 points were not included, since improvement by 2 points was not possible.

Number of Participants Who Were Alive at 6 Months Following Radiotherapy6 months following radiotherapy

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause.

Time to death was calculated from the last day of radiotherapy, and the patients were followed for a maximum of 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. The values of 6-month OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade >=2 Radiotherapy-related Toxicityduring radiotherapy and up to 6 months following radiotherapy

Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4)

Trial Locations

Locations (15)

Oberschwabenklinik Ravensburg

🇩🇪

Ravensburg, Baden-Wutemberg, Germany

Charite Berlin

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Center of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology

🇩🇪

Bremen, Germany

Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University

🇱🇹

Vilnius, Lithuania

Saad Specialist Hospital

🇸🇦

Khobar, Saudi Arabia

Institute of Oncology

🇸🇮

Ljubljana, Slovenia

Cruces University Hospital

🇪🇸

Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain

University of Lübeck

🇩🇪

Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Consorcio Hospitalario Provencial de Castellon

🇪🇸

Valencia, Castellon, Spain

Mayo Clinic

🇺🇸

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Klinikum Bayreuth

🇩🇪

Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany

University of Regensburg

🇩🇪

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

University of Würzburg

🇩🇪

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Ruhr University

🇩🇪

Bochum, North Rhine Westphalia, Germany

Radiotherapy Practice Dresden-Friedrichstadt

🇩🇪

Dresden, Saxonia, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath