MedPath

Gait After THA: Direct Anterior vs Manual Posterior vs Robotic Posterior

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Registration Number
NCT07226973
Lead Sponsor
Ochsner Health System
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the gait biomechanics following THA on 3 groups of subjects undergoing DAA (manual) and PA (manual and robotic) surgical approaches.

Detailed Description

Single-center, three-arm, partially randomized interventional study comparing gait biomechanics after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) via (1) manual direct anterior approach (DAA), (2) manual posterior approach (PA), and (3) robotic-assisted posterior approach (rPA). One surgeon's patients are randomized to DAA vs PA; the second surgeon's patients receive rPA per routine practice. Outcomes assessors are blinded (motion-capture suit conceals dressings/scars). Gait and sit-to-stand analyses are performed pre-op and at 6 and 12 weeks post-op using a Vicon motion capture system with force plates and surface EMG. Patient-reported outcomes are collected with standard instruments. The trial evaluates short-term biomechanical recovery and patient-reported outcomes across approaches.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults aged >18 undergoing primary elective THA for osteoarthritis
  • BMI <35
  • Ability to walk unassisted (cane, walker, wheelchair, ect) for > 150 feet preoperatively
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous hip surgery on the affected side
  • Neurological disorders affecting gait
  • Contraindication to either DAA or PA

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Walking speed during level gait (m/s)Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op.

Mean self-selected walking speed measured over instrumented walkway during motion-capture trials.

Peak hip abduction moment during stance (Nm/kg)Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op.

Maximum external hip abduction moment during stance, normalized to body mass.

EMG- Gluteus medius peak activation at initial contact/loading responseChange from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op.

Peak normalized surface EMG amplitude of the operated-side gluteus medius measured during the initial contact/loading response of level walking. EMG is sampled synchronously with motion capture and force plates, band-pass filtered (\~20-450 Hz), rectified, and low-pass filtered (\~6 Hz) to form a linear envelope. Strides are time-normalized to 0-100% gait cycle; the peak is extracted within 0-10% of the gait cycle (heel strike through loading response). Amplitude is normalized to the participant's maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Participant-level values are the mean of valid trials at each visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
postoperative complications-(participants with ≥1 event, %)through study completion, an average of 1 year

Postoperative complications include, but are not limited to:

Surgical \& Local Complications Dislocation

Prosthetic Joint Infection (Early or Late)

Aseptic Loosening

Periprosthetic Fracture

Implant Wear (Osteolysis)

Wound Complications (Hematoma, Dehiscence)

Nerve or Vascular Injury

Leg Length Discrepancy

Heterotopic Ossification

Implant Failure or Breakage

Adverse Local Tissue Reaction (Metallosis)

Tendon/Muscle Dysfunction

Medical \& Systemic Complications Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Cardiovascular Events (Heart Attack, Stroke)

Patient Reported Outcome Measures-HOOSBaseline; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 12 months; change from baseline - Score (0-100)

Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Questionnaire. Range 0-100, higher=better

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Ochsner Health Center - Elmwood

🇺🇸

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Ochsner Medical Center

🇺🇸

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Ochsner Health Center - Elmwood
🇺🇸Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Miguel Jaramillo
Contact
504-703-8002
miguel.jaramilloforero@ochsner.org

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.

Gait After THA: Direct Anterior vs Manual Posterior vs Robotic Posterior | MedPath