Gait After THA: Direct Anterior vs Manual Posterior vs Robotic Posterior
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
- Registration Number
- NCT07226973
- Lead Sponsor
- Ochsner Health System
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the gait biomechanics following THA on 3 groups of subjects undergoing DAA (manual) and PA (manual and robotic) surgical approaches.
- Detailed Description
Single-center, three-arm, partially randomized interventional study comparing gait biomechanics after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) via (1) manual direct anterior approach (DAA), (2) manual posterior approach (PA), and (3) robotic-assisted posterior approach (rPA). One surgeon's patients are randomized to DAA vs PA; the second surgeon's patients receive rPA per routine practice. Outcomes assessors are blinded (motion-capture suit conceals dressings/scars). Gait and sit-to-stand analyses are performed pre-op and at 6 and 12 weeks post-op using a Vicon motion capture system with force plates and surface EMG. Patient-reported outcomes are collected with standard instruments. The trial evaluates short-term biomechanical recovery and patient-reported outcomes across approaches.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
- Adults aged >18 undergoing primary elective THA for osteoarthritis
- BMI <35
- Ability to walk unassisted (cane, walker, wheelchair, ect) for > 150 feet preoperatively
- Previous hip surgery on the affected side
- Neurological disorders affecting gait
- Contraindication to either DAA or PA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Walking speed during level gait (m/s) Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op. Mean self-selected walking speed measured over instrumented walkway during motion-capture trials.
Peak hip abduction moment during stance (Nm/kg) Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op. Maximum external hip abduction moment during stance, normalized to body mass.
EMG- Gluteus medius peak activation at initial contact/loading response Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op. Peak normalized surface EMG amplitude of the operated-side gluteus medius measured during the initial contact/loading response of level walking. EMG is sampled synchronously with motion capture and force plates, band-pass filtered (\~20-450 Hz), rectified, and low-pass filtered (\~6 Hz) to form a linear envelope. Strides are time-normalized to 0-100% gait cycle; the peak is extracted within 0-10% of the gait cycle (heel strike through loading response). Amplitude is normalized to the participant's maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Participant-level values are the mean of valid trials at each visit.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative complications-(participants with ≥1 event, %) through study completion, an average of 1 year Postoperative complications include, but are not limited to:
Surgical \& Local Complications Dislocation
Prosthetic Joint Infection (Early or Late)
Aseptic Loosening
Periprosthetic Fracture
Implant Wear (Osteolysis)
Wound Complications (Hematoma, Dehiscence)
Nerve or Vascular Injury
Leg Length Discrepancy
Heterotopic Ossification
Implant Failure or Breakage
Adverse Local Tissue Reaction (Metallosis)
Tendon/Muscle Dysfunction
Medical \& Systemic Complications Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Cardiovascular Events (Heart Attack, Stroke)Patient Reported Outcome Measures-HOOS Baseline; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 12 months; change from baseline - Score (0-100) Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Questionnaire. Range 0-100, higher=better
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Ochsner Health Center - Elmwood
🇺🇸Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Ochsner Medical Center
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Ochsner Health Center - Elmwood🇺🇸Metairie, Louisiana, United StatesMiguel JaramilloContact504-703-8002miguel.jaramilloforero@ochsner.org
