MedPath

Comparison of Hemodynamic and Respiratory Parameters During Physical Activity

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cardiovascular Check-up
Interventions
Other: Mask
Registration Number
NCT04805489
Lead Sponsor
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Brief Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has completely changed societal activity, including physical activity.

Recommendations for wearing masks vary from country to country, region to region, and may be mandatory or optional in indoor or outdoor environments.

During physical activities, the latest ministerial recommendations are that wearing a mask is not mandatory even in case of close distance of less than one meter and in case of physical contact (ministerial recommendations of September 19, 2020), even in regions where wearing a mask is mandatory outdoors. This is based on elements not explained by the Ministry of Sports and partly on elements showing a limitation of respiratory capacities during exercise tests with gas exchange measurements. Indeed, subjects with FFP2 masks have their maximal capacity to effort and VO2max decreased as well as the respiratory capacities whether at rest or during effort in comparison with subjects without mask and to a lesser degree with surgical masks.

However, the FFP2 mask is not recommended by the medical or sports authorities, and surgical or general public masks are recommended. Moreover, during leisure time physical activities, it is not frequent that the subjects need to be at their maximum physical capacity. This moderate loss of physical capacity at the peak of the effort is for most amateur athletes not relevant in their practice.

In addition, airborne transmission of COVID-19 has been shown in several studies: in a choir, on a commercial airplane, on a bus, and close contact is a secondary source of contamination.

There is concern that physical activity in non-open environments is becoming a source of COVID-19 contamination. In studies in non-open environments (bus, church, airplane), the degree of contamination in a so-called confined atmosphere varies between 35 and 85%. In Miller's study, in a church choir with a distance of 0.75 m between choristers and 1.4 m between each row, after 2.5 hours of rehearsal including breaks and buffet, without wearing a mask and with social distancing, hand washing with a hydro-alcoholic solution and reduction of contacts, the contamination with a single patient was 85% on a total of 61 choristers. One can imagine what the degree of contamination would be during a physical activity in a gymnasium without wearing a mask, even with hand and foot washing and floor decontamination.

Currently, all sports activities are stopped but they will start again sooner or later.

Before the recontainment, according to the directives of the Ministry of Sports, the wearing of masks was not compulsory and it was not recommended in outdoor activities (golf...) and in gymnasiums including activities with contact (judo, dance...). Many people are reluctant to wear a mask during sports activities: discomfort, fear of loss of performance, hypoxia...

However, it seems essential to us to determine, during a physical activity, what are the cardiac and respiratory consequences of wearing a surgical or general public mask, before resuming sports activities in a few weeks or months.

It seems important to us to determine the degree of deterioration of the cardiac and pulmonary physical capacities during physical leisure activities which concern more than 99% of the leisure activities as opposed to the sports activities practised by professionals, this to enlighten the practitioners and the ministerial authorities on the possible non-deterioration of the physical capacities with the effort and the absence of deleterious effect of the wearing of a mask.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Athletic person coming to the GHPSJ for a cardiovascular check-up
  • Person whose age is ≥ 18 years old
  • Person practicing a sport for more than 1 year
  • Regularly practicing sports (> 2 hours weekly)
  • Person affiliated with a health insurance plan
  • French-speaking person
  • Person who has given free, informed and written consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Persons under guardianship or trusteeship
  • Person deprived of liberty
  • Person symptomatic of a disease
  • Person with a history of heart or lung disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
stress test with masksMaskWithin the framework of this research, an additional stress test is performed. This stress test, consisting of 3 periods, will follow a cardiovascular assessment requested as part of a health check-up, a license application, for risk factor assessment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
peak VO2Month 1

The peak VO 2 will be measured during cardiac stress test for each mask at 1 month, to compare the 3 masks.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparaison of Changes in lung parameters between 3 masksMonth 1

This ouctome corresponds to the evaluation of modification of lung parameters: respiratory rate, exhaled volumes, power reached at maximum effort between the 3 masks.

Degree of discomfort feltMonth 1

This ouctome correspond to lickert's scale. Questionnaire: Are you satisfied with the mask you have just worn? Responses: Totally agree/Agree/Somewhat agree/Somewhat disagree/Disagree

Comparaison of Modification of cardiac parameters between 3 masksMonth 1

This outome corresponds to the evaluation of modification of cardiac parameters: heart rate, blood pressure between the 3 masks.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

🇫🇷

Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath