MedPath

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema
Interventions
Procedure: Standard of care laser photocoagulation
Drug: Fluocinolone Acetonide
Registration Number
NCT00344968
Lead Sponsor
Alimera Sciences
Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal insert of fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
956
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age >= 18 years with diabetic macular edema
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus types 1 or 2
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 19-68 letters
  • Retinal thickness > 250 micron by OCT
  • Investigator is comfortable deferring macular laser treatment for 6 weeks
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Glaucoma, ocular hypertension, IOP >21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at screening with IOP lowering agents
  • Retinal or choroidal neovascularization due to ocular conditions other than diabetic retinopathy
  • Prior intravitreal, subtenon, or periocular steroid therapy within 6 months
  • Any ocular surgery within the last 3 months
  • Retinal laser treatment within the last 3 months
  • History of uncontrolled IOP elevation with steroid use that did not respond to topical therapy
  • Any lens opacity which impairs visualization of the posterior pole
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
3Standard of care laser photocoagulation-
1Fluocinolone Acetonide-
2Fluocinolone Acetonide-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Acuity36 months

The percentage of subjects with an increase from baseline of 15 or more letters in best corrected visual acuity letter score as assessed by ETDRS eye chart (study eye).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Retinal Thickness36 months

Retinal images where sent to a reading center for analysis. Some images were not clear/distorted and could not be properly analyzed. This accounts for the discrepancy in the number of participants analyzed.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath