Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07176169
NCT07176169Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Effects of Innominate Rotation Correction Compared With Sacral Torsion Correction in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Foundation University Islamabad2 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: December 30, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
JOINT DISABILITY

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comparative effects of Innominate Rotation Correction and Sacral Torsion Correction using Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) in patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD). A total of 50 participants will be recruited, aged 18-50 yrs, with confirmed SIJD based on atleast 3 positive provocation tests. Participants will be randomized into two equal groups. Group A (Innominate Rotation Correction) and Group B (Sacral Torsion Correction). Both groups will receive Conventional Therapy (Thermotherapy, Electrotherapy and Core stabilization exercises).

Study variables include:

  • Independent Variable: Type of MET applied (Innominate vs Sacral Torsion)
  • Dependent Variables: Pain (measured by Visual Analog Scale), Functional Disability (assessed via Denver SIJ Disability Questionnaire)
  • Control Variables: Age, Gender, BMI, Baseline Pain/ Disability Scores

The intervention will last 4 weeks with 8 sessions (2 sessions per week). Assessments will be conducted at baseline (Week 1, Pre-treatment) and Post every second session. Data will be analyzed to compare immediate and short-term effects of the two interventions.

This study aims to provide evidence for targeted manual therapy approaches in SIJD, potentially guiding clinicians toward the most effective technique for pain reduction and functional improvement.

Detailed Description

This Randomized Controlled Trial aims to compare the effects of Innominate Rotation Correction versus Sacral Torsion Correction using Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) in patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD).

A Total of 50 participants will be recruited and randomized equally into two groups.

  • Group A: Sacral Torsion Correction via METs
  • Group B: Innominate Rotation Correction via METs

Both groups will additionally receive conventional management (TENs, Heating, Core Stabilization Exercises).

INTERVENTION SCHEDULE:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Dysfunction based on at least 3 of the following tests
  • •Distraction Test
  • •Compression Test
  • •Gaenslen's Test
  • •Thigh Thrust Test
  • •Sacral Thrust Test
  • •Presence of Pain in Buttock, Posterior Pelvis, or Lower Lumbar Region for more than 2 weeks
  • •Confirmed Pelvic Asymmetry through Palpation (i.e., ASIS/PSIS Landmarks, Gillet's Test)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •• History of Lumbar or Pelvic Fracture, Recent Surgery, or Hip/Knee Pathology affecting Gait/Posture.
  • •Pregnancy or Post-partum less than 6 months - due to Hormonal Laxity & Altered Biomechanics
  • •Systemic Inflammatory conditions - Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • •Neurological Deficits - Cauda Equina Syndrome, Radiculopathy with Motor Loss
  • •Ongoing Physiotherapy treatment for Low Back Pain in past 4 weeks
  • •Inability/Contraindications to tolerate Manual Therapy - Osteoporosis
  • •Leg Length Discrepancy - >1.5 cm or Structural Scoliosis
  • •BMI > 35 (ASIA) - it may affect assessment validity due to obesity

Arms & Interventions

Group A: Sacral Torsion Correction

Active Comparator

Participants allocated to this arm will receive Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) for Sacral Torsion Correction.

Covering Patterns:

  • Left-on-Left Torsion
  • Right-on-Right Torsion
  • Left-on-Right Torsion
  • Right-on-Left Torsion
  • Bilateral Nutation
  • Bilateral Counternutation

Each participant will undergo 8 sessions over 4 weeks (2 Sessions/week), and receive Conventional Physiotherapy

Intervention: Muscle Energy Technique for Sacral torsion (Procedure)

Group B: Innominate Rotation Correction

Experimental

Participants allocated to this arm will receive Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) for Innominate Rotation Correction along with Conventional Treatment.

  • Anterior Rotation
  • Posterior Rotation Each participant will undergo 8 Sessions over a period of 4 weeks (2 Sessions/week).

Intervention: Muscle Energy Technique for Innominate rotation (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

JOINT DISABILITY

Time Frame: Before and After 4 weeks.

The Denver Sacroiliac Joint Disability Questionnaire (DSIJQ) comprises 10 items that assess various aspects of SIJ-related disability, including pain intensity, mobility, self-care, and social participation. Each item is scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5. (0 - No Disability; 5 - Unable to perform activity). To calculate the total percentage, the obtained score is divided by 50 and multiplied by 100 to calculate total percentage. Then it is compared with an Ordinal Scale grading, shown as follows: * 0-20% = Minimal Disability * 21-40% = Moderate Disability * 41-60% = Severe Disability * 61-80% = Crippled * 81-100% = Bed-bound or Exaggerating symptoms

JOINT PAIN

Time Frame: Before Treatment and After 4 weeks

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a simple patient-reported measure of current Pain Intensity. Scoring - Patients mark their pain on a 10-cm horizontal line, anchored by "No Pain" (0-cm) and "Worst Possible Pain" (10-cm), and the distance between 0-cm to the Point of Pain perception is marked as the recorded score (in millimeters or centimeters). High Value means Severe Pain and vice versa.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials