Alternative Gingival De-Epithelialization Techniques
- Conditions
- Recession, GingivalWound HealSurgical Procedure, UnspecifiedGraft Complication
- Interventions
- Procedure: MucotomeProcedure: Diamond BurProcedure: Surgical Blade
- Registration Number
- NCT05947305
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different de-epithelialization methods in patients undergoing soft tissue augmentation surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
• Which technique is superior for de-epithelialization in terms of remaining epithelium, wound healing of the donor site, and clinical outcomes?
- Detailed Description
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four surgical techniques during their surgical procedure and the wound site will be assessed on post-operative days 1, 7, 14, and 21.
Researchers will compare the use of mucotome, Er:YAG laser, surgical diamond bur, or blade to observe patterns of wound healing and assess if one method is superior in terms of removing the epithelium.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II
- Subjects undergoing periodontal surgical procedures that involve harvesting of soft tissue samples, who have a treatment plan including the use or removal of keratinized mucosa or subepithelial connective tissue that will not require additional anesthesia for sample collection
- Adequate physical and mental health to undergo routine dental treatment
- Ability and willingness to follow instructions related to the study procedures
- Poorly controlled diabetes, defined as HbA1c >/= 7.0
- Autoimmune or inflammatory conditions such as systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis.
- Pregnant women or nursing mothers, or unsure of pregnancy status (self-reported)
- Severe hematologic disorders, such as leukemia or hemophilia
- Subjects on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
- Local or systemic infection that may interfere with healing
- Hepatic or renal diseases
- Currently under cancer treatment or within 18 months from completion of radio- or chemotherapy
- History of antibiotic or immunosuppressant use in the last 3 months
- Subjects on concomitant drug therapy for systemic conditions that may affect outcomes of the study
- Current smokers (CDC definition): heavy smokers: subjects who have smoked >10 cigarettes per day within 6 months of study onset, and have smoked >100 cigarettes in their lifetime
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mucotome Mucotome A mucotome will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery. Diamond Bur Diamond Bur A diamond bur will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery. Surgical Blade Surgical Blade A surgical blade will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Histomorphometric Comparison After Day 0 (Baseline surgery) Histomorphometric evaluation of the relative proportion of epithelial tissue remnants (percentage) after de-epithelialization of the CTG
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Wound healing Days 1, 7, 14, 21 (Post-operative) after surgery Wound healing comparisons using a clinical healing index (CHI) developed by Pippi et al 2015 will be completed. The possible total score is 7 (ideal score demonstrating ideal healing = 0), with scores for each section being dichotomous (0 or 1). Parameters related to clinical inspection include: mucosal color, granulation tissue, epithelialization degree, and swelling. Palpation parameters include bleeding, pain, and suppuration.
Surgical Time Day 0 (Baseline Surgery) Time spent removing the epithelium (in minutes)
Patient-reported outcome measures Days 1, 7, 14, 21 (Post-operative) after surgery Patient-reported outcome measures regarding pain and discomfort after the procedure using a line scale (from no pain to worst pain imaginable), box scale (ranging from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable), and a verbal rating scale (no pain, slightly painful, moderately painful, very painful, extremely painful). The number of analgesics (along with dosage) taken during the post-operative period will be recorded.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Michigan School of Dentistry
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States