Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06911619
NCT06911619RecruitingNot Applicable

Impact of Nutritional Management on the Frailty of Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation (Via the LFI Tool)

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 site in 1 country210 target enrollmentStarted: June 30, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
210
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Evaluate the impact at 3 months, of a nutritional management and follow-up by a dietitian specialized in hepatology compared to the usual management without dietary follow-up, on the fragility of patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Cirrhosis is a major public health issue responsible for about 15000 deaths each year. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative treatment for decompensated cirrhosis. Decompensated cirrhotic patients awaiting LT are malnourished, sarcopenic and fragile. The evaluation of the nutritional status of these patients is complex because the anthropometric data that define undernutrition (weight variation, BMI) are often compromised by the presence of edema and ascites related to liver disease. It therefore seems appropriate to focus on the fragility and sarcopenia of the cirrhotic patient as a reflection of the nutritional status. In 2017, the American team of Lai et al. validated a Liver fraily index (LFI) score of frailty specific to cirrhotic patients waiting for LT. The LFI is composed of three simple physical tests (Grip test, chair lift test, and balance tests) performed at the patient's bedside, which results in a quantitative and reproducible frailty score. Frailty while waiting for LT is associated with an increase in mortality on the waiting list, independently of the MELD (Model for End stage Liver disease) score, which is a reflection of liver severity. About half of the patients who are candidates for LT will present an aggravation of their frailty while waiting for LT. To date, no study has reported the results of a nutritional intervention on the evolution of fragility in patients awaiting LT. The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of a nutritional management and follow-up by a dietitian specialized in hepatology on the fragility of patients waiting for LT. This is a monocentric study, randomized in two parallel groups (an intervention group with nutritional follow-ups by a trained dietitian and a control group with follow-up by the reference hepatologist without specific dietary management by a dietician) in open. All patients enrolled on the LT list with an LFI > 3.2 (pre-frail and frail state) will be included in the study. It is planned to include 210 patients over a period of 24 months. The LFI will be measured for all patients (control group + intervention group) at 3 and 6 months, as part of their follow-up in the LT center. This study will also make it possible to correlate frailty with other parameters (severity of liver disease, access to LT).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patient aged ≥ 18 years
  • •Patient registered on the waiting list for Hepatic Transplantation in the Transplantation center of the Croix Rousse Hospital (GHN), Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • •Dated and signed an informed consent
  • •Affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of a similar scheme

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient hospitalized in intensive care
  • •Patient with initial LFI test result < to 3.2, that is considered as "robust".
  • •Patient unable to perform LFI exercises (chronic or acute motor disability in lower or upper limbs)
  • •Pregnant, parturient or lactating women
  • •Persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
  • •Persons under psychiatric care
  • •Persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research
  • •Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship)
  • •Inability to understand protocol information
  • •Subject participating in another interventional research including an ongoing exclusion period at inclusion

Arms & Interventions

Standard Follow up

Other

The patient will be followed up by his referee hepatologist every 3 months. The 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits pending transplantation will be performed with a Clinical Research Assistant on the same day as the follow-up consultation with his hepatologist with the completion of the LFI test and the collection of intercurrent events and the re-evaluation of the liver disease.

Intervention: No dietary management (Other)

Dietary intervention Group

Experimental

The intervention consists of a personalized dietary management with a nutritional follow-up pending transplantation. Teleconsultation appointments are scheduled with the dietician for dietary coaching and a re-evaluation of the nutritional strategy. Follow-up visits in person, carried out by the dietician at the 3rd and 6th month waiting for liver transplantation and are coupled with the usual consultations with the referring hepatologist. The visits allow the realization of LFI (Liver Frailty Index), the collection of interrelated events and the reassessment of hepatic disease as well as the re-evaluation of the nutritional strategy (oral nutritional supplement, enteral or parenteral nutrition)

Intervention: Dietary management (Dietary Supplement)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evaluate the impact at 3 months, of a nutritional management and follow-up by a dietitian specialized in hepatology compared to the usual management without dietary follow-up, on the fragility of patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).

Time Frame: 3rd month after visit 1.

Measurement of LFI (Liver fraily index) score score variation between D0 (baseline = visit 1) and 3 months (first reassessment = visit 2) during the liver transplantation waiting period. This variation will be compared between the intervention group and the control group.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Evaluate the impact of a nutritional follow-up on the fragility of patients at 6 months on list(6th Month after visit 1.)
  • Evaluate the impact of a nutritional follow-up on the distribution of patients' frailty according to classes: robust, pre-fragile, fragile(3rd Month (M3) after Visit 1 and M6 after V1)
  • Evaluate compliance with oral nutritional supplement treatment for patients awaiting transplant(3rd Month and 6th month after Visit 1)
  • Evaluate the relationship between fragility and severity of liver disease (MELD score)(Day 0, 3rd Month (M3) and 6th Month (M6))
  • Evaluate the relationship between fragility and access to a transplant(Day 0, Month 3 after Visit 1, Month 6 after Visit 1)
  • Evaluate the relationship between fragility and mortality on waiting list of transplantation or leaving the list due to worsening(Day 0, 3rd month and 6th month)
  • Evaluate the relationship between frailty and unscheduled hospitalizations while waiting for Liver Transplantation(Day 0, 3rd month and 6th month after Visit 1)
  • Evaluate the satisfaction of dieticians in carrying out nutritional monitoring for patients waiting for liver transplantation (logistics of organizing consultations and teleconsultations)(study completion at Month 30)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials