Electrical Vestibular Nerve Stimulation (VeNS) as a Treatment for Anxiety
- Conditions
- Anxiety
- Registration Number
- NCT04999709
- Lead Sponsor
- Neurovalens Ltd.
- Brief Summary
Anxiety is known to be one of the most common health concerns in in the general population, and the most common mental health issue, and has been associated with several health consequences. Medications are known to be effective, and currently serve as the primary treatment for anxiety but comes with a risk of adverse effects. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT-1) has also been shown to be effective and safer in the treatment of anxiety but presents its own limitations such as the time, cost, and training required. The relationship between vestibular stimulation and anxiety continues to be explored, however its usefulness in the treatment of anxiety is still unknown. Vestibular stimulation itself has been shown to be safe across multiple populations. If vestibular stimulation is shown to be effective in the treatment of anxiety, it could serve as a safer alternative to medications. It could also require less cost, time, and training than CBT-1, providing a treatment option that is not only safe and effective, but broadly available to the general population. It also could present an alternative intervention for patients who are non-responsive or refuse medication. Consequently this trial seeks to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive electrical vestibular nerve stimulation as a method of improving sleep quality and quantity, as compared to a sham control, in patients newly diagnosed with anxiety.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Scores 4 weeks To evaluate the effect of the VeNS device, relative to control group on participants with anxiety (range 0-21) with higher score indicating more severe anxiety.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of adverse events 4 weeks To evaluate the safety of the VeSTAL device relative to control group, in terms of the occurrence of adverse events.
Quality of life using SF-36 scores 4 weeks To evaluate the effect of the VeNS device, relative to control group, on quality of life. SF-36 is a 36-item short form survey (range 0-100) with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score 4 weeks To evaluate the effect of the VeNS device, relative to control group on participants with insomnia. ISI is a self-report rating scale assessing the severity of insomnia symptoms (range 0-28) with higher scores indicating a more severe insomnia.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
🇭🇰Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University🇭🇰Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
