跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/02/062201
CTRI/2024/02/062201尚未招募3 期

A Comparative Study To Find Out The Efficacy Of Oral Care With Chlorhedinine Versus Multicomponent Bundle Without Chlorhexidine In Mechanical Ventilated Patients In Intensive Care Unit

Anushapreethi S1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,286 人开始时间: 2024年2月28日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
1,286
试验地点
1
主要终点
Incidence of IVACs between control and intervention groups during ventilator days.

研究概览

简要总结

*     Allthe patients above 18yrs admitting to six ICUs will be screened for our study,

*     Submittedto intubation, expected to remain on mechanical ventilation for more than 48hrs.

*     ICUprotocol for oral care without chlorhexidine will be standardized (TABLE 2)

*     Afterenrollment, the intervention group will be given oral care with multicomponentcare bundle includes 0.20% chlorhexidine solution every 12 hrly and toothbrushing, oral suctioning and mouth/lip moisturization (TABLE 1) versus

*     Thecontrol group will be given toothbrushing, oral suctioning and mouth/lipmoisturization without chlorhexidine care.

*     Demographiccharacteristics including age, sex will be noted on admission.

*     Theparticipants also will undergo the standard protocol for prevention of VAP,which included

*     1.Maintaining a semirecumbent body position, with head elevation of ≥ 30°,

*     2.Gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis,

*     3.Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis and

*     4.Daily interruption of sedation with assessing the possibility of extubation

PRIMAZRY OBJECTIVE- Toevaluate the time to IVACs between control and intervention groups.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE-

*     To evaluate 1.oral health status dysfunctionmeasured using BOAS Beck oral assessment score

*                        2.CPOT Critical care painobservation,

*                        3. ventilator days,

*                        4. ICU stay,

*                        5. 28 day mortality,

*                        6. VAP incidence

*     Continueduntil the patient isextubated or tracheotomised or died

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Admitted to the ICU and requiring mechanical ventilation.
  • 2.Anticipated to require mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours.
  • 3.Patient or legal representative has provided informed consent.

排除标准

  • Patients with known hypersensitivity or allergy to Chlorhexidine.
  • Patients already in another oral care study.
  • Patients with severe oral trauma or recent oral surgery.
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 48hrs Patients for whom oral care maybe contraindicated due to specific medical conditions.
  • (e.g. certain types of oral cancer, certain neurological conditions affecting swallowing).

结局指标

主要结局

Incidence of IVACs between control and intervention groups during ventilator days.

时间窗: 6 weeks of ICU stay

次要结局

  • To evaluate 1.oral health status dysfunction measured using BOAS Beck oral assessment score(2.CPOT Critical care pain observation,)

研究者

发起方
Anushapreethi S
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A study comparing the oral care with chlorhexidine... | 临床试验