MedPath

Assessment of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Versus Autogenous Bone Grafts : A Comparative Clinical Study in Alveolar Cleft Grafting

Not Applicable
Conditions
Alveolar Cleft
Interventions
Procedure: secondary alveolar bone graft
Procedure: Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite
Procedure: harvesting of the autogenous bone graft
Registration Number
NCT04693559
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

This work aims to evaluate Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite versus Autogenous bone grafts in alveolar cleft grafting

Detailed Description

Alveolar cleft is the most common congenital bone defect. Since its introduction in 1972, alveolar bone grafting (ABG) has been widely accepted to correct alveolar bone defect in most cleft centres.The purpose of ABG is to restore the dental arch continuity, stabilize the maxilla, close the oronasal fistulae, facilitate subsequent orthodontic treatment, enhance nasal symmetry, establish better oral hygiene, limit growth disturbances, etc . Autologous bone grafting is the gold standard for treating alveolar clefts, with the iliac crest , bone being the most widely accepted donor site(Tan, Brogan et al. 1996.New bone graft substitutes have been devised in recent decades, such as demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), calcium phosphate (CP), calcium sulfate (CS), hydroxyapatite (HA), highly purified bovine xenograft, and more, but clinical evidence of their efficacy varies among clinical and experimental studies \[4\] With the advent of new biomaterials, which may include or consist of allogenic bone source such as collagen membranes, hydroxyapatite crystals, tricalcium phosphate powder that has been increased consideration for their placement in the repair of alveolar clefts as well as other dental applications

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age (7 - 12 years )
  • Non-syndromic CLA or CLP
  • More than 6 months of follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of previous alveolar surgery
  • History of active infection or underlying disease such as hematologic disorders , neoplasm, and immune deficiency
  • Patients who had received primary or tertiary ABG

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Nano crystalline Hydroxyapatite (group B)Nanocrystalline HydroxyapatiteNano crystalline Hydroxyapatite will be used to fill the alveolar defect
autogenous iliac bone graft (group A)harvesting of the autogenous bone graftautogenous iliac bone graft will be used to fill the alveolar defect
autogenous iliac bone graft (group A)secondary alveolar bone graftautogenous iliac bone graft will be used to fill the alveolar defect
Nano crystalline Hydroxyapatite (group B)secondary alveolar bone graftNano crystalline Hydroxyapatite will be used to fill the alveolar defect
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Measuring of bone volume 6 months post-operative6 months

compare between outcome of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite versus autogenous bone graft in alveolar bone grafting regarding the newly formed bone volume

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath