Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00308087
NCT00308087
Terminated
Phase 2

Randomized, Open Label, Phase II Trial Comparing Rituximab Plus Sargramostim to Rituximab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Relapsed Follicular B-cell Lymphoma

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company0 sites75 target enrollmentMay 2006

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Rituximab
Conditions
Lymphoma, Follicular
Sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Enrollment
75
Primary Endpoint
Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with rituximab plus sargramostim will be more effective than rituximab alone.

Detailed Description

On 29 May 2009, Bayer began transitioning the sponsorship of this trial to Genzyme. As of 29 August 2009, Genzyme assumed responsibility for the close out of the study. NOTE: This study was originally posted by sponsor Berlex, Inc. Berlex, Inc. was renamed to Bayer HealthCare, Inc. The study was terminated early due to low enrollment; significant changes to the protocol would have been required to keep pace with the changing therapeutic landscape of indolent lymphoma.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2006
End Date
June 2009
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Rituximab

Intervention: Rituximab

Rituximab + Sargramostim

Intervention: Sargramostim (Leukine)

Rituximab + Sargramostim

Intervention: Rituximab

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12

Time Frame: Week 8 (confirmed at Week 12)

Count of number of participants who responded with a Complete Response (complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiological evidence of disease) at week 8 and again clinically and radiologically confirmed at week 12.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)(up to 12 weeks)
  • Participant Summary of Best Response Across All Visits(up to 24 months)
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival(24 months)
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Partial Response or Better to Treatment(24 months)
  • Summary of Cost Effectiveness(24 months)

Similar Trials