MedPath

Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
Device: Tensionfree vaginal mesh kit (Prolift)
Procedure: classic vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication)
Registration Number
NCT00372190
Lead Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Brief Summary

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. A lot of women have surgery for prolapse. The recurrence rate op pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment is high. Placement of a mesh aims at reducing the recurrence rate, but mesh implants can cause complications.

This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of one type of mesh (tensionfree vaginal mesh; Prolift), compared with the standard prolapse surgery. A secondary objective is to track the complications of both procedures.

Detailed Description

Patients with recurrent prolapse after surgery can participate in this study. A total of 194 women will be included. At random 97 patients undergo a standard prolapse operation and 97 patients undergo an operation with the mesh. Evaluation will take place during surgery, at the postoperative visit after six weeks, and after six months and twelve months. Quality of life, degree of vaginal prolapse, subjective effectiveness, safety and incidence of complications will be evaluated.

An amendment to the original study has been approved by the Ethical Committee to examine long term outcome of this RCT at 7 years. This study was completed in december 2015.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
194
Inclusion Criteria
  • recurrent anterior and/or posterior prolapse POP-Q stage 2 or more
  • patient has agreed to undergo implantation of TVM (prolift) or fascial plication
  • patient is willing to return for follow-up evaluation at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
  • patient is willing to complete quality of life questionnaires at 6 and 12 months
Exclusion Criteria
  • patient is or wants to become pregnant
  • patient has had previous synthetic mesh procedure (a previous mid-urethral sling procedure is NOT an exclusion criterion)
  • patient has current urinary tract or vaginal infections
  • patient has a blood coagulation disorder
  • patient has a compromised immune system or any other condition that would compromise healing
  • patient has renal insufficiency and/or upper urinary tract obstruction
  • patient is unwilling or unable to return for evaluation
  • patient has had previous irradiation
  • patient has any malignancy
  • patient has large ovarian cysts of large myoma

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Mesh surgeryTensionfree vaginal mesh kit (Prolift)Trocar guided tension free vaginal mesh insertion by Prolift mesh kit
Conventional vaginal surgeryclassic vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication)Classical vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prolapse by "Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System" (POP-Q), at 12 Months12 months

Number of participants with anatomic failures defined as "Pelvic Organ Prolapse" (POP) stage II or higher

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bulge Symptoms12 months

Bulge symptoms defined as Prolapse domain score of the "Urogenital Distress Inventory" (UDI) at 12 months.

Scores range from 0 (least/no bother) to 100 (maximum bother)

Mesh Exposure at 12 Months12 months

cumulative number of patients with mesh exposure at 12 months (if diagnosed at 6 weeks or 6 months and treated, the exposure is calculated at 12 months, even if the exposure was not there anymore)

"Patient Global Impression of Improvement" (PGI-I) at 12 Monthsat 12 months

Number of participants with much to very much improvement compared to baseline

Trial Locations

Locations (13)

UMC St Radboud

🇳🇱

Nijmegen, Netherlands

Medisch Spectrum Twente

🇳🇱

Enschede, Netherlands

Refaja

🇳🇱

Stadskanaal, Netherlands

Isala klinieken

🇳🇱

Zwolle, Netherlands

Slysis Zorggroep, location Rijnstate

🇳🇱

Arnhem, Netherlands

Groene Hart Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Gouda, Netherlands

Ikazia

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Netherlands

St. Elisabeth hospital

🇳🇱

Tilburg, Netherlands

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Zaans Medisch Centrum

🇳🇱

Zaandam, Netherlands

Gelre ziekenhuizen

🇳🇱

Apeldoorn, Netherlands

Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis

🇳🇱

Delft, Netherlands

Twee Steden Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Tilburg, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath