Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05614609
NCT05614609
Completed
Not Applicable

Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Norwegian Hospital

Ostfold University College1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentMarch 1, 2023

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Lidocaine topical
Conditions
Postoperative Complications
Sponsor
Ostfold University College
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Degree of hoarseness 1 hour after extubation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Few studies have compared different methods for optimalizing intubation conditions in general anesthesia. This randomized controlled trial will compare two different methods for intubation in general anesthesia in gastro- or gynecological procedures.

Detailed Description

In general anesthesia, it is neccessary to secure the airways with an endotracheal tube. There is no international consensus on how intubation is most efficiently conducted. A cochrane review compared using muscular relaxing medication versus not using blocks for intubation. Primary outcomes were intubation conditions and discomfort in upper airways. The authors concluded that research is limited, and that further research is needed. No studies have compared local anesthetic spray on the glottis and muscular relaxing medication in intubation, focusing on discomfort in upper airways. The null-hypothesis of this study is that there is no difference in upper airway discomfort when using local anesthetic spray or muscular relaxing medication. The study will have a randomized controlled design, randomizing patients undergoing gastro- or gynecological procedures in general anesthesia to receiving either rocuronium (muscle relaxing medication) intravenous, or lidocain spray on the glottis before intubation. The primary outcome is postoperativ hoarseness one hour after intubation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 1, 2023
End Date
January 31, 2025
Last Updated
9 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ostfold University College
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ann-Chatrin Leonardsen

Professor

Ostfold Hospital Trust

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA (American Association of Anesthesiologists Classification system for physical status) I-III
  • Understand and can express themselves in Norwegian
  • Able to give informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cave lidocain and/or muscle relaxing medication
  • BMI above 40
  • Anticipated difficult intubation
  • Need for ventricular tube
  • Pathology or malformations in upper airways

Arms & Interventions

Lidocaine spray on the glottis

Lidocaine 20 mgl/ml- 4,4 ml will be sprayed on the glottis. Ventilation for 90 sek, intubation

Intervention: Lidocaine topical

Muscle relaxing medication

Rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg administered intravenous. Ventilation for 2.5 minutes (150seconds), intubation

Intervention: Lidocaine topical

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Degree of hoarseness 1 hour after extubation

Time Frame: 1 hours

Scored on a scale : 0=no, 1= self reported hoarseness, 2=observed hoarsness by care personnel, 3=aphonia

Secondary Outcomes

  • Proportion of patients who cough on tube at extubation(At extubation)
  • Number of patients needing extra equipment for intubating(At intubation)
  • Proportion of patients who cough when spraying(At intubation)
  • Intubation conditions(Before intubation)
  • Number of intubation attempts(At intubation)
  • Proportion of patients with normal anatomy in upper airways(At intubation)
  • Heart rate changes during intubation(at intubation)
  • Proportion of patients with blood on tube after extubation(At extubation)
  • Blood pressure changes during intubation(at intubation)
  • Degree of hoarsness 24 and 48 hours after extubation(2-48 hours)
  • Proportion of patients reporting different degrees of sore throat at 2, 24 and 48 hours after extubation(2-48 hours)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
A comparative study of intubating conditions and hemodynamic parameters during general anesthesia using rocuronium and vecuronium in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. A prospective randomized double blind studyHealth Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2023/06/053643SDM COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HOSPITA
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Study to compare side effects and complications during endotracheal intubation of new borns with or without using standard protocol
CTRI/2022/02/040281Dr Mehta Multispecialty Hospital Pvt Ltd
Unknown
Not Applicable
Sedation Compaired With Anesthesia With THRIVE in Endotracheal Intubation With Difficult AirwaysSedative, Hypnotic, or Anxiolytic WithdrawalAirway Control
NCT04924621Peking University42
Completed
Phase 4
Remifentanil Versus Sufentanil for Intubation Condition Without MyorelaxantAnaesthetic Induction
NCT01910285University Hospital, Toulouse70
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of two techniques for introducing tube into the trachea of patients given general anaesthesia for routine surgeries, using a device called video laryngoscope (C-MAC)- with and without a tracheal introducer called bougie.Health Condition 1: null- 1.adults between 18-60 years age. 2.those undergoing elective surgery planned for orotracheal intubation. 3.ASA class 1-2Health Condition 2: H701- Chronic mastoiditisHealth Condition 3: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhereHealth Condition 4: C55- Malignant neoplasm of uterus, partunspecified
CTRI/2017/09/009793Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research162