se of Cardiac MRI in patients with presumed heart attack and unobstructed coronary arteries
- Conditions
- Clinical decision-making in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteriesCirculatory System
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN75233845
- Lead Sponsor
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Ongoing
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 82
1. Presentation with MINOCA (as per the 2016 ESC consensus statement definition)
2. Presence of diagnostic uncertainty* as to the underlying mechanism.
3. Treating clinician intends to further assess by CMR
4. Age >18 years
*Diagnostic uncertainty is defined as at least some doubt on the part of the treating clinician as to the underlying mechanism for the MINOCA, and quantified as a certainty level =8 (range 1-10, with 1 being fully uncertain and 10 being fully certain)
1. Treating cardiologist deems the diagnosis is already felt to be secure (=9 of the certainty scale which has a range 1-10)
2. CMR is contra-indicated or not planned
3. Type II myocardial infarction rather than MINOCA
4. Symptom onset >2 weeks prior to CMR
5. Pregnancy
6. Does not have capacity to consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnosis and management assessment completed by the treating cardiologist before and after the patient has undergone the cardiac MRI (questionnaire assessment of working diagnosis, diagnostic certainty [scale 1 - 10] and clinical management)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br> Assessment completed by the treating cardiologist before and after the patient has undergone the cardiac MRI (questionnaire assessment of working diagnosis, diagnostic certainty [scale 1 - 10], and clinical management):<br> 1. Diagnosis<br> 2. Diagnostic certainty<br> 3. Management<br> 4. Incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction at 1 year measured using patient records<br> 5. Incidence of clinically-significant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type II, III or V) at 1 year measured using patient records<br>